• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Jorge Grant

marshal99

John Robertson
To be fair,grant would never have grown as a player he has if he had remained at forest. He has learned his defensive duties and not as lightweight as before
. I would be happy if forest resign him back.
 

Thomas

AMERICAN IDIOT
Didn’t grant come from the Nike academy? He’s growth has always been a year or two behind.
 

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion

It's Baggio

John Robertson
Grant did well for Notts for a season and a half in League 2 scoring goals although was considered to be a passenger at times. He failed to impress at Luton in League 1 and had his loan terminated early. He then impressed at Mansfield for the remainder of the 2018/19 season.

He signed for Lincoln for an undisclosed fee in the summer of 2019. In the 2019 season he scored 2 goals for Lincoln in League 1. It’s only this season just gone that he managed to replicate his League 2 scoring form.

I’m not in the know, but his sale to Lincoln was probably as much a case of Grant wanting to leave Forest for first team football as it was Forest looking to offload as they thought he wouldn’t make the step up .

Taking 16 penalties helped.
 

BryanRoy

Stuart Pearce
Quite an achievement with the amount of clubs that have been linked to him in the last 18-24 months.

It seemed QPR were all but set to be announced but it looks like Posh now.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
Grant was nowhere near ready for first team football here. Not even close. He was 21 when he left but built like a 14 year old, and hadn't asserted himself in any of the games he started.

He's done really well to get his career where it is now, but he could have quite easily ended up in semi-pro leagues too. There was absolutely no guarantees he would ever turn out to be anything half decent.
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
Grant was nowhere near ready for first team football here. Not even close. He was 21 when he left but built like a 14 year old, and hadn't asserted himself in any of the games he started.

He's done really well to get his career where it is now, but he could have quite easily ended up in semi-pro leagues too. There was absolutely no guarantees he would ever turn out to be anything half decent.

It is frighteningly likely that we discarded someone with genuine confidence and a goal-scoring ability, for not having put a bit of bulk on at a young age.
 

Rzar

Bob McKinlay
It is frighteningly likely that we discarded someone with genuine confidence and a goal-scoring ability, for not having put a bit of bulk on at a young age.

Or that he just wasn't good enough. He's had 5 years of football since he last played the Championship, you can't wait around for players forever.

I hope he does well and will be happy if he does, mainly because it was the right decision to sell him when we did.
 

Tobias

Jack Burkitt
Ah. Like we risk doing with Carvalho then?

Ah. Like we should with Carvalho then.

Carv22.jpg
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
Ah. Like we risk doing with Carvalho then?

Lol at "genuine goal-scoring ability" for Carvalho. 0 goals in 32 this season

Lol at confidence too for that matter, Carvalho's been a fragile princess until now.

Also:

Grant fee = £0, Grant rumoured Wage currently = 3k/wk = £156k/year

Carvalho fee = £13.2m, Carvalho rumoured Wage = £15k/wk = £3.42m/year



1 year of Carvlaho buys you 21 years of Grant.


You have exactly right there the failed logic of this club, and why Vrentroz was putting us in such a mess.
 
Last edited:

DanR

Steve Chettle

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
It is frighteningly likely that we discarded someone with genuine confidence and a goal-scoring ability.

But he didn't display those things when he was here.

There are probably hundreds of Forest youth products that have been given a few games at senior level and shown a tiny bit of promise that we could have kept and attempted to nurture but instead we released and they have ended up nowhere.

Barry Roche, Spencer Weir Daly, Gregor Robertson, Alex Iacovitti, Adam Newbold, Mark Byrne, Anel.. for starters.
 

congo_red_49

Ale Ape
I think he’s made a good move. He’ll fit in well in the Peterborough style of play and I’d be very surprised if he doesn’t enhance his reputation, even in a relegation battle.
 

cheapseats

Grenville Morris
But he didn't display those things when he was here.

There are probably hundreds of Forest youth products that have been given a few games at senior level and shown a tiny bit of promise that we could have kept and attempted to nurture but instead we released and they have ended up nowhere.

Barry Roche, Spencer Weir Daly, Gregor Robertson, Alex Iacovitti, Adam Newbold, Mark Byrne, Anel.. for starters.

I think he did show his shooting ability while he was with us at first team level. Trouble was he was very lightweight and was clearly a luxury carry in midfield that we couldn't afford....
 

marshal99

John Robertson
I think he did show his shooting ability while he was with us at first team level. Trouble was he was very lightweight and was clearly a luxury carry in midfield that we couldn't afford....

like carvalho then with the same situation except with lesser goals but keyword being 'potential'.
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
The fact posh are the championship club who took a gamble probably says what it needs to say.

The team who were the in the top 1 joint goalscorers out of all 92 league clubs, alongside other top 1 team Man City? (both with 83 goals for)

Yep. To me mate that says they know a goal-scorer when they see one. Is he up to Champ level? We'll see this season I guess.

Ah, goalscoring. Something the Vrentroz era has seemed utterly determined to beat out of Nottingham Forest's core for 3 1/2 years.
 
Last edited:

cheapseats

Grenville Morris
The team who were the in the top 1 joint goalscorers out of all 92 league clubs, alongside other top 1 team Man City? (both with 83 goals for)

Yep. Says to me they know a goal-scorer when they see one. Is he up to Champ level? We'll see this season I guess.

Ah, goalscoring. Something the Vrentroz era has seemed utterly determined to beat out of Nottingham Forest's core for 3 1/2 years.

Alf-the Grant situation played out before Vrentroz I think?-my memory is it was 2017 or so-he was pretty much out on loan from there on.
Agree that Posh know goal scorers but their model is just another moneyball variant, one where they specialise in show casing goal scorers because its high reward (and probably high risk as well) but its very specific and wouldn't suit us because I am certain this comes at the expense of other aspects of the team and I don't think that would be acceptable at most clubs and certainly not Forest.

I think its safe to say that if we had the Grant 2021 model on our books now and not the 2017 one he would be under contract here and being used. But whilst there have been many terrible player mistakes here Jorge Grant isn't one I loose sleep over. I honestly don't think we would have got him rounded out as a midfielder sufficiently from where he was in 2017 within our first team. I think the fans would have been on his back after a short while when other teams were strolling through our midfield and we were loosing games as a a result and so the move to Lincoln was, even in retrospect the right one for all parties.
Anticipating your come back on this, I wouldn't apply that logic for all the youngsters we've given up on and shifted out. Several might have been OK, but in Grants specific circumstances in 2017 I don't believe that was the case
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
Alf-the Grant situation played out before Vrentroz I think?-my memory is it was 2017 or so-he was pretty much out on loan from there on.
Agree that Posh know goal scorers but their model is just another moneyball variant, one where they specialise in show casing goal scorers because its high reward (and probably high risk as well) but its very specific and wouldn't suit us because I am certain this comes at the expense of other aspects of the team and I don't think that would be acceptable at most clubs and certainly not Forest.

I think its safe to say that if we had the Grant 2021 model on our books now and not the 2017 one he would be under contract here and being used. But whilst there have been many terrible player mistakes here Jorge Grant isn't one I loose sleep over. I honestly don't think we would have got him rounded out as a midfielder sufficiently from where he was in 2017 within our first team. I think the fans would have been on his back after a short while when other teams were strolling through our midfield and we were loosing games as a a result and so the move to Lincoln was, even in retrospect the right one for all parties.
Anticipating your come back on this, I wouldn't apply that logic for all the youngsters we've given up on and shifted out. Several might have been OK, but in Grants specific circumstances in 2017 I don't believe that was the case

Grant went to Lincoln July 2019. I'm not sure how loaning him out effects that mate? Young players need loans to develop. Doesn't mean that they're not fancied. Ultimately the decision to sell 2019 was the key moment, and that was very much Pea-face's tenure.

For an undisclosed fee to a club who's record signing was £100k in 2018 let's not forget. SO we'd have got f*** all for him too.

It's not about the player and whether he would or wouldn't make it. It's about the fact that Vrentroz was discarding players with potential already here and on a low wage, for ones which cost far, far more both to bring and keep here.

It's a balance between all approaches, and our has been f***ing awful.
 
Top Bottom