• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Matthew Charles Turner

Morpeth

John Robertson
Matt Turner had played 7 games in European football. It was a weird transfer last year and I’ve still no idea if he’s any good but it’s about as uninspiring as it gets.
 

Harrison

Jack Armstrong

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
So what if Fulham fans rave about him? That dosen’t mean he’s as good as Lodi. I’ve seen both Aina and Lodi play and I think at this stage that Lodi is a superior player. That can obviously change and I hope my opinion does cause if he is as good as Lodi on a free I’d be estatic.
It's irrelevant really though I guess we all like to make comparisons.

Aina is our player, he cost us nothing, and can play CB, LB and RB.

Lodi was not our player but we got his services last season. He has just gone to OM for what, 15+m, who even knows if we'd matched that fee and wages if he would have come to us anyway. He can also only play LB.

Last season we lost Richards to injury, for the whole season. Lodi and Toffolo also had spells where they were carrying knocks. Aurier had a spell out and so did Neco although in the latter that was a bit of an unfortunate accident. In terms of CBs we at one stage were down to Worrall and Felipe as we had McKenna, Boly, Niakhate and Biancone out injured, had Cook at the club but couldn't register him.

This time out we have to register Johnson and Williams in the 25 as they are now old enough to need it.

I know Neco can play LB as well as RB, I know Biancone and Aurier can play CB as well as RB, but we are short of options in the squad where a single player can cover many positions.

In terms of the 25 and squad depth Aina is decent and by all accounts he isn't a bad player either, he's come from the Italian league which is stereotypically strong on defending so presumably has ability as well as versatility.

Singularly in terms of ability to play the LB position Lodi is probably better but if you consider we might have had no chance at all of getting him permanently then the situation is somewhat academic.

Ditto Henderson or Navas, it may be that Man U pissing around draw us to other targets like Turner, it may be we decide against Navas due to his increasing age and cost even for another loan, or the player might have other options, these may not be possible for whatever reason. At the end of the day we can only get players who can come.

We also have to think about FFP so we can't splash too much and also, options in the 25 man squad when we already have plenty of players who could play for us but would need registering and aren't good enough who we need to loan out or move on (Panzo, Laryea, Mbe Soh, Hwang, Bowler, Cook for example).
 

EmmersonForest4

Steve Chettle
It's irrelevant really though I guess we all like to make comparisons.

Aina is our player, he cost us nothing, and can play CB, LB and RB.

Lodi was not our player but we got his services last season. He has just gone to OM for what, 15+m, who even knows if we'd matched that fee and wages if he would have come to us anyway. He can also only play LB.

Last season we lost Richards to injury, for the whole season. Lodi and Toffolo also had spells where they were carrying knocks. Aurier had a spell out and so did Neco although in the latter that was a bit of an unfortunate accident. In terms of CBs we at one stage were down to Worrall and Felipe as we had McKenna, Boly, Niakhate and Biancone out injured, had Cook at the club but couldn't register him.

This time out we have to register Johnson and Williams in the 25 as they are now old enough to need it.

I know Neco can play LB as well as RB, I know Biancone and Aurier can play CB as well as RB, but we are short of options in the squad where a single player can cover many positions.

In terms of the 25 and squad depth Aina is decent and by all accounts he isn't a bad player either, he's come from the Italian league which is stereotypically strong on defending so presumably has ability as well as versatility.

Singularly in terms of ability to play the LB position Lodi is probably better but if you consider we might have had no chance at all of getting him permanently then the situation is somewhat academic.

Ditto Henderson or Navas, it may be that Man U pissing around draw us to other targets like Turner, it may be we decide against Navas due to his increasing age and cost even for another loan, or the player might have other options, these may not be possible for whatever reason. At the end of the day we can only get players who can come.

We also have to think about FFP so we can't splash too much and also, options in the 25 man squad when we already have plenty of players who could play for us but would need registering and aren't good enough who we need to loan out or move on (Panzo, Laryea, Mbe Soh, Hwang, Bowler, Cook for example).
Statto if they are the best we can get than it is what it is, Ive got no problem but we do have weaker 11 than last year if its Turner and Aina in my view. I actually quite like the Aina signing cause we need is versatility as a squad player. I just dont think he is better than Lodi at LB so we are weaker. Is what it is
 

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
Matt Turner had played 7 games in European football. It was a weird transfer last year and I’ve still no idea if he’s any good but it’s about as uninspiring as it gets.
He's their first choice internationally (though the choice is admittedly he, Zach Steffen and Horvath) and played well enough in the MLS for Arsenal to spend 10m on him when they still had Aaron Ramsdale. Arteta isn't a mug and they aren't exactly flush with cash so presumably he has some ability.

Downside for him is that as well as clubs not rotating keepers much if at all Ramsdale is rarely if at all injured and extremely consistent so it's unlikely he'll get action without the cups and also, that with Raya coming in that will be even less so.

I don't know much about him either, but the US have always produced good keepers - Tony Meola, Kasey Keller, Brad Friedel, Tim Howard, Brad Guzan, Marcus Hahnemann, most of which have had good careers at the top level and in the PL. Keller had been at Millwall a few years when Leics signed him but he was soon a good player for them. Friedel would have come to us but Cloughie couldn't get a WP for him and he ended up going to Liverpool a few years later then Blackburn and Spurs where he played for years and was always solid.
 
He's their first choice internationally (though the choice is admittedly he, Zach Steffen and Horvath) and played well enough in the MLS for Arsenal to spend 10m on him when they still had Aaron Ramsdale. Arteta isn't a mug and they aren't exactly flush with cash so presumably he has some ability.

Downside for him is that as well as clubs not rotating keepers much if at all Ramsdale is rarely if at all injured and extremely consistent so it's unlikely he'll get action without the cups and also, that with Raya coming in that will be even less so.

I don't know much about him either, but the US have always produced good keepers - Tony Meola, Kasey Keller, Brad Friedel, Tim Howard, Brad Guzan, Marcus Hahnemann, most of which have had good careers at the top level and in the PL. Keller had been at Millwall a few years when Leics signed him but he was soon a good player for them. Friedel would have come to us but Cloughie couldn't get a WP for him and he ended up going to Liverpool a few years later then Blackburn and Spurs where he played for years and was always solid.
Friedel was a great (underrated?) keeper, didn’t know we almost signed him.
 

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
Friedel was a great (underrated?) keeper, didn’t know we almost signed him.
yes, for example

Today's subject is the daddy of all Premier League goalkeepers, the one who has been around so long he can remember the back-pass rule being introduced, has been so consistent he shattered all records for consecutive games, and is actually older than Ryan Giggs as well as Scholes and Henry. But for work permit problems, Brad Friedel would have signed for Nottingham Forest under Brian Clough in 1993, which would have put him in England right at the start of the Premier League era. As it was, he had to stay in the United States and ended up contracted to the national team as his country prepared to host the 1994 World Cup, but Friedel was 22 in 1993, knew his future lay in England, and was only forced to wait until 1997, when he finally got a move to Liverpool, by red tape.
 

Ashley

Steve Chettle
For my money, Turner is every bit as good as Henderson. He's a big strong fearless type and if we can get him we should drop our Tolkien-esque quest for Hendo and grab this guy.
I wouldn't be unhappy with Turner, he's always seemed decent from what I have seen of him. But Arsenal asking for £18m for a 29 year old who is 2nd (soon to be 3rd) choice at his current club is taking the piss IMO. I think the £12m we have offered Arsenal for Turner is more than generous, and if they won't accept that then we should move on from him (and Henderson, which is a saga that I am also sick of at this point) and look elsewhere.
 

Ashley

Steve Chettle
If we pay anymore than about £6m for Turner someone at the club needs shooting.
He's probably worth a bit more than that, but I am really not a fan of spending eight-figure transfer fees on players in their late-20s/30s. Even the £12m we have offered for Turner is a bit on the high side IMO.

Spending big money on older players is a bad strategy for any club wanting to stay in line with FFP. I'm still in disbelief at the absolutely dreadful deal for Chris Wood (and then Giraldi trying to defend it as the most FFP friendly deal we could do!).
 

Quarantine the Pass

First Team Squad
12 million is fine for Turner. He's worth it. But I still think Dominik Livakovic, with his 9 million (?) release clause will be a complete steal for whomever ponies up. I just checked, Fenerbache have had 7.7 accepted. At times, you have to wonder what scouts are doing. Not just our club either.
Livakovic all day for me, but I think Turner is pretty solid. He's been exceptional for the national team and was excellent in MLS. I know it's a shit league (except Chicago Fire) but I think goalkeeper is perhaps the one position that you can make a fairly safe judgment if they are any good or not.
 

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
More chance of Alex Turner.
 

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
12 million is fine for Turner. He's worth it. But I still think Dominik Livakovic, with his 9 million (?) release clause will be a complete steal for whomever ponies up. I just checked, Fenerbache have had 7.7 accepted. At times, you have to wonder what scouts are doing. Not just our club either.
There will be a reason why he is 28 and has not left Dinamo yet despite being the national team keeper at deep runs in tournaments.

Most of the talented players in that league go off to another league when they're a lot younger than that and he has been in their first team long enough to make over 200 appearances for them.

The release clause is quite low for a keeper who has played in a world cup semi final and presumably plenty in the champions league and it can't be that clubs haven't been aware of him because he's been around the top flight in Croatia and the national side for long enough (you only need to have been following the last world cup). So there has to be another reason why he hasn't been signed by anyone. Maybe this could be as simple as that he doesn't want to go and play abroad?

I guess sometimes looking good in a national side can be a bit misleading. He is surrounded by top defenders and other players like Modric who have been at the highest level of the game for years. Subasic who was there before played for Monaco. In the past they have also played (or had in squads) Simon Sluga who was at Luton for a while, and that lad who was a bit of a flapper at Villa whose name escapes me. We also had Stojkovic (who was Serbian) who was a flapper and eventually Mark Warburton preferred to play Jordan Smith. Muric was Kosovo's keeper when we had him on loan too. If you are the only one (or the best of a bunch of bad options) you will get caps even if you're not playing regularly for a club.

If we look at the USMNT keeper options, then it's largely between
Matt Turner, who has played only a few cup appearances for Arsenal
Zach Steffen, who is contracted to Man City but has only played twice for them, and spent last season on loan at Boro in the 2nd tier
Ethan Horvath (who we all know about)
None of them are getting regular football at their parent clubs so do they pick a MLS keeper who is but might not be as good?

There were rumours last year we were interested in Livakovic, maybe the club looked at him and didn't think he was worth it or good enough?
 
Top Bottom