We're selling Mangala aren't we? The suggested fee would seem to bring us pretty close.If we are struggling to comply for 2024, then it might be better for us in the long run if the independent commission do take into account the 'double jeapordy' and treat Everton's 2nd charge with leniency.
So, you’d rather we didn’t criticise the owner and his actions, just on the basis that we’ve had a worse owner before?
And if we do criticise we’re ‘mardy’?
Seriously, is that the level we’re at?
I give up.Loading…
www.thetimes.co.uk
In effect, Masters and his cronies have the option to lodge a counter-appeal against what they may regard as potential leniency shown to us by the commission in response to the PL demand for an 8-points sanction.I'm told an appeal could lead to a further points deduction, which shocked me to be honest.
As I understand it there's only an option for Lyon to buy Mangala, no obligationI give up.
How can this be true? We have extra headroom by being in the prem another year, Johno’s sale is now counted in the next period (hence this mess) plus, as mentioned above, the impending sale of Mangala.
What gives?
All of the above, plus the rumoured changes to the rules potentially coming as well.I give up.
How can this be true? We have extra headroom by being in the prem another year, Johno’s sale is now counted in the next period (hence this mess) plus, as mentioned above, the impending sale of Mangala.
What gives?
Is it case though, just for Forest, that their overall commercial income is so low, that it does not allow them to maintain the current playing squad, hence the requirement (or, alleged requirement) to sell a player - again - in the summer?I give up.
How can this be true? We have extra headroom by being in the prem another year, Johno’s sale is now counted in the next period (hence this mess) plus, as mentioned above, the impending sale of Mangala.
What gives?
I don’t think they have included any of that information in their sums, most people are saying the article is very wrong.I give up.
How can this be true? We have extra headroom by being in the prem another year, Johno’s sale is now counted in the next period (hence this mess) plus, as mentioned above, the impending sale of Mangala.
What gives?
Guess that depends on how many new toys the Marinakis’ want?But with the revenue from Johnson (47.5m) and Mangala (25m possibly) that is over 70m there, is the suggestion that Forest need to sell yet another player?
I give up.
How can this be true? We have extra headroom by being in the prem another year, Johno’s sale is now counted in the next period (hence this mess) plus, as mentioned above, the impending sale of Mangala.
What gives?
Yep, EFL have Appealed cases before. Presumably the PL can too.In effect, Masters and his cronies have the option to lodge a counter-appeal against what they may regard as potential leniency shown to us by the commission in response to the PL demand for an 8-points sanction.
The suggestion is that we need to sell another player before (cough) the end of June.We've already used the extra headroom.
This seasons limit is -£83m (£13m + £35m + £35m)
We are already at -£92m before we even consider this season (£40m loss in FY2022, £52m loss in FY2023)
Does selling Johnson/Mangala/Scarpa/Surridge get us from a £52m loss in 2023 to a £9m profit in 2024?
Johnson is £48m of pure profit alone so...with the others.....yes?We've already used the extra headroom.
This seasons limit is -£83m (£13m + £35m + £35m)
We are already at -£92m before we even consider this season (£40m loss in FY2022, £52m loss in FY2023)
Does selling Johnson/Mangala/Scarpa/Surridge get us from a £52m loss in 2023 to a £9m profit in 2024?
The Ziegler article seems to suggest that we do.Johnson is £48m of pure profit alone so...with the others.....yes?
So no more star player sales required.
The suggestion is that we need to sell another player before (cough) the end of June.
Johnson is £48m of pure profit alone so.....yes?
They’ll probably find a way of changing the rules so the ‘big’ clubs get more leeway…and we get less.I thought they were changing the reporting rules so that big clubs can't get caught up in it next year.
So shouldn't our calculations of where we are have that factored in?
I thought they were changing the reporting rules so that big clubs can't get caught up in it next year.
So shouldn't our calculations of where we are have that factored in?