Mr. Blonde
Jack Burkitt
Imagine if Billy Davies was still here and how he would cope with these decisions…
Imagine if Billy Davies was still here and how he would cope with these decisions…
Agreed, this was avoidable and in no small part due to our own incompetence.The rules suck yes. But we knew what they were and still acted as we did.
Also remember due to promotions bonuses (I assume) we lost £40mil in the championship. That was an avoidable loss. Especially as our promotion team was almost entirely loan and academy based.
Jimmy Saville's last 3 submissions to the commissioning editors.Sounds like an 80's kid show
Take it on the chin
Tekkit up the tailpipe and lets start bastad winning.
Well... Gotta get up again!!
On the price of football they said that voting for extending the payments would have cost us £8m next year. No wonder the clubs that can’t afford that didn’t vote for itIt's difficult.
When we got promoted Marinakis said we would be voting with the big clubs. He wanted to play in the big time and be seen as part of the power block.
And last week Forest were one of 10 clubs who voted against extending Solidarity Payments to the EFL.
So sometimes we like the unfairness.
This form of FFP will now end. So we can't change that.
Will be building a coalition of the willing inside the EPL, assuming we stay up? I doubt it.
Imagine if Billy Davies was still here and how he would cope with these decisions…
Maybe Derbyvstill have their's and we can ask to borrow it.Can we get some banners made up to help the push back?
Maybe "Fight to the end!!"?
Yeah sure, but whether it’s 4 points or something less we still have to perform on the pitch and I would image Nuno has a view on the further instability an appeal would create
In summery, instead of trying to compete we should have known and accepted our place.Some of the notes are unbelievable, investing heavily once in the Prem is a "negative trend"?!
It really is all a load of bollocks.
View attachment 36455
Yes.On the price of football they said that voting for extending the payments would have cost us £8m next year. No wonder the clubs that can’t afford that didn’t vote for it
That sounds like saying we shouldn't have got promoted.The rules suck yes. But we knew what they were and still acted as we did.
Also remember due to promotions bonuses (I assume) we lost £40mil in the championship. That was an avoidable loss. Especially as our promotion team was almost entirely loan and academy based.
It reeks of 'go high because we know it will be knocked down'.Just for the fact that they asked the Commision to give us an 8 point penalty, even though the Everton appeal clearly stated that the ultimate bench mark was the 9 pts for administration, means we should go after them as hard as possible. Asking for 8 points was clearly vindictive.
If only all the clubs in the bottom half would work together, to pursue a better deal, rather than revel in others misfortune.
Remember, eventually they will come for you.
He'd also say there'll be lots of twists and turns before the end of the season (and maybe beyond!)
How many teams had to build an entire Premiere league squad in a year?To be honest its a laughable argument. Why are we in a position that we have to sell a player to pass? That is the opposite of sustainability. Every club sells players to get by. However they dont rely on selling a player after they have splurged all their dough. Brighton buy within limits than sell big than go again. Its the complete different way round to us. Brighton do it sustainably.
I understand that point but the rules are there. You can’t break them and that say you don’t like them. I think the rules are shite, unfair and backward however they are the rules. Everyone’s first thought should be anger with decision makers at Forest not the premier league.How many teams had to build an entire Premiere league squad in a year?
If this guy is correct that you got three points for breaking the rule, another three for the extent of the breach, and then minus 2 because of mitigating circumstances, and if indeed you have proof that the delay in Johnson's sale was known by that Premier, then with the appeal you could probably remove the extra three points for the extent of the breach, but not the three points for breaking the rules. So you would only win one point back. Is it worth the trouble?Some thoughts by Maguire.
Just got back from my Morris Dancing class any news ? , have I missed oot?
I don't know whether they are or aren't allowed but I can't see them giving Everton another points deduction this season and if they are going to change the way they determine failure of PSR they could push it to the following season and forget it.I didn't think suspended points were a thing anymore. It was the reasoning to push submission dates earlier. To make sure punishments get applied to current season.