Dino
Duncan McKenzie
I was thinking he reminded me of someone!I think his mother may well have spent some “quality” time with R9 20 odd years ago.
I was thinking he reminded me of someone!I think his mother may well have spent some “quality” time with R9 20 odd years ago.
We had all these similar conversation last summer when we signed Henderson on loan with a buy option. He was a good signing, did well, but ultimately we ended right back at square one again this summer either chasing him (Henderson) or trying to find a replacement.
I agree with your post, but Navas couldn't win us 3 points in any game.He helped Forest stay in the Premier League. Same with Navas.
We wouldn't have been able to outright buy better keepers than those two last season and had we had a weaker goalkeeper we would have probably been relegated. Navas' performance vs Leeds at home single-handedly won us 3 points and the number of games we won by a single goal could have been very different with a weaker keeper.
We're in a better position now than we would have otherwise been had we not loaned players last year with no obligation or option to buy.
The key difference being we knew what we were getting with both of those signings. I'm not against loaning players, but in the case of Santos we have a 19 year old lad with the majority of his experience in the Brazilian second division and we are all assuming he is a clear upgrade on what we already have. It is ok to say 'well if he is rubbish he won't play' but there appears to be some understanding that he will be getting significant minutes this season which would indicate they expect him to start.He helped Forest stay in the Premier League. Same with Navas.
We wouldn't have been able to outright buy better keepers than those two last season and had we had a weaker goalkeeper we would have probably been relegated. Navas' performance vs Leeds at home single-handedly won us 3 points and the number of games we won by a single goal could have been very different with a weaker keeper.
We're in a better position now than we would have otherwise been had we not loaned players last year with no obligation or option to buy.
The key difference being we knew what we were getting with both of those signings.
I would imagine so, given the timing of the announcement. Generally, the registration has to be done, by midday, the day before a match.This means he is in time to play tomorrow, no?
If that is the case I would have thought we'd want one of their young players on a permanent rather than a straight loan.Wonder whether there’s a “gentleman’s agreement” with Chelsea/Brennan that we’ll do that deal next summer?
Would explain the odds of him staying shortening. Wonder whether any of the other rumoured Chelsea players will turn up.
Can't imagine he'll join the squad without any training?
It’s happened beforeCan't imagine he'll join the squad without any training?
Think he played against Brighton in preseason fwiw.As he's been at Chelsea since January, and notwithstanding that he hasn't played any minutes himself, he should at least have seen PL football from a close enough distance to be fully aware of the expectations.