Gyros Peter
Sauce salad?
Hasn't improved things and has ruined the best part of football - bin it off.
Its going nowhere. People can keep saying to get rid, but they won't.Hasn't improved things and has ruined the best part of football - bin it off.
Until one breaks or doesn't connect instantly. Just give a man a little flag i say.Offside can be automated.
All of the players wear vests nowadays with performance trackers on. If the vests also had positional trackers then the relative position of defenders & attackers can be determined at the point of which the ball gains velocity (also possible with a tracker inserted). No fannying about with whether attackers left big toe was being played on by defenders right bollock. Tracker says they were level or offside - job done.
That's a really good idea. If a tracker could be pinned onto their shirt or sports vest or something in the same place and was reliable enough not to break down, then it would be in the same place on each player and it would avoid the "is his knee hair 2mm behind the defender's peen" that we get when the nit picking lines are drawn.Offside can be automated.
All of the players wear vests nowadays with performance trackers on. If the vests also had positional trackers then the relative position of defenders & attackers can be determined at the point of which the ball gains velocity (also possible with a tracker inserted). No fannying about with whether attackers left big toe was being played on by defenders right bollock. Tracker says they were level or offside - job done.
All accurate to the nearest millimetre - won't work.That's a really good idea. If a tracker could be pinned onto their shirt or sports vest or something in the same place and was reliable enough not to break down, then it would be in the same place on each player and it would avoid the "is his knee hair 2mm behind the defender's peen" that we get when the nit picking lines are drawn.
Even asking "if there's daylight between" is a bit subjective really as it depends where you measure it. If the ball had a tracker in it too (as I think they are), you could get this from the instant the ball was kicked as well. If this happens at any point and there is an attacker ahead of the last defender in the opponent's half, then it beeps the ref to the offside.
Yes, that was quite funnyAll accurate to the nearest millimetre - won't work.
It's a game of football - not landing a spaceship blind on a different planet.
Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut doesn't even convey how ridiculous it's all getting and the fact i made an albeit crap joke earlier in this thread and it wasn't blatantly obvious, shows that we're entering the endgame for the game i love.
"Why can’t we have three VAR officials watch a single camera angle in real time. Then another three watching another camera and so on. All you need really is 12 cameras, needing 36 extra VAR officials and for every camera angle each time they see something against the laws they press a button. If two officials on the same camera angle press within 0.1 seconds of each other then that angle counts as a foul. Then you use all twelve angles to determine if its an overall foul and the ref on the field can be told instantly in his ear. If the twelve angles are split evenly at 6-6 then let the on field referee decide. Piece of piss."
Even Mil-spec GPS isn't that accurateOffside can be automated.
All of the players wear vests nowadays with performance trackers on. If the vests also had positional trackers then the relative position of defenders & attackers can be determined at the point of which the ball gains velocity (also possible with a tracker inserted). No fannying about with whether attackers left big toe was being played on by defenders right bollock. Tracker says they were level or offside - job done.
Bin it, it's sucking the life out of the game.
Seems easy eh.There is a much easier solution to all this if only the football authorities were prepared to admit they got it wrong and bowed to pressure from outside, mostly the TV companies. and have ended up with an impractical product and over complicated rules which render the whole thing unworkable.
Simplify the rules and also change the wording to 'If in the opinion of the referee' and let everyone get on with it.
Then if you want to use VAR let them analyse all the footage to their hearts content for 3 days after the game and if they find any infringement missed by the referee, or any simulation or misdeed by a player then they can ban the player by up to 5 games. Similarly, if a referee keeps getting things wrong they can be suspended for 2 weeks whilst they go on an intensive course to learn how to do it properly.
Then we can all get on with enjoying the game and the emotional rollercoaster it brings and they can dick around all they want with analysis afterwards.
A few 5 game bans for Grealish and he'll learn to stop diving.
Hard to say it eliminates the howlers after this weekendI think Surridge was offside and I thought VAR has helped us with the Palace and Leicester games. I like it, it is consistnet to me and it eliminitaes the howlers. I know the non offsides can be subjective decisions but I always think its better a ref can get a second look and that eliminates the diving for me. The Sabri season I yearned for VAR with some of the decisions we had. I dont think refs are good enough to not have it.
Agreed but it does eliminate much more howlers. It does make me laugh though as what to people more wrong decisions? Thats what getting rid of VAR means. I hope people don't moan about refs if they decide they dont want it.Hard to say it eliminates the howlers after this weekend
It doesn't, it just introduces its own things which the VAR can mess up as opposed to the actual officials at the match.Hard to say it eliminates the howlers after this weekend
I am very happy to have more wrong decisions if it makes the game better overall.Agreed but it does eliminate much more howlers. It does make me laugh though as what to people more wrong decisions? Thats what getting rid of VAR means. I hope people don't moan about refs if they decide they dont want it.
Yep Howard Webb will hopefully be a big improvement.VAR is here to stay but we now have Howard Webb in control.
Already he is taking responsibility for poor decisions, and apologising to clubs, whilst reviewing the process.
It is clear that his intention is to ensure that the system is properly applied, and to ensure that those involved in decisions are accountable. I also hope that he addresses the lazy refs who ‘leave it to VAR’ rather then make a decision.
I expect to see better monitoring of referee performances (including the VAR referee) which will have consequences. Also we should see decisions in a more timely fashion.
A discussion on the use of AI, especially for offsides, is likely, and hopefully the technology will develop.
Interestingly Webb will also meet with representatives of the Football Supporters Association in the near future.
One other important aspect is the poor behaviour of too many players at Elite level. Sadly this behaviour is copied throughout football causing huge difficulty in recruiting and retaining new referees. Over time this will have serious consequences for elite levels of the game - the great majority of PL & EFL referees come through the grass roots system.
During my years as player and spectator I’ve witnessed a wide range of refereeing styles but at local level the worst games were those with no official referee and a ‘volunteer’ replacement.
What I would also add to the "things they should do" which you hint on there but don't suggest quite as far, is - if VAR has to overturn a decision by the ref and assistants at the game, this is a reportable incident. For all of these cases, there needs to be a discussion with HW (or someone similar who oversees the refs), the ref, assistants and the VAR officials discussing why the decision was wrong and to put steps in place to make sure the same thing doesn't happen next time, or has less chance of this. The outcome is then shared with all of the other officials so everyone is on the same page.VAR is here to stay but we now have Howard Webb in control.
Already he is taking responsibility for poor decisions, and apologising to clubs, whilst reviewing the process.
It is clear that his intention is to ensure that the system is properly applied, and to ensure that those involved in decisions are accountable. I also hope that he addresses the lazy refs who ‘leave it to VAR’ rather then make a decision.
I expect to see better monitoring of referee performances (including the VAR referee) which will have consequences. Also we should see decisions in a more timely fashion.
A discussion on the use of AI, especially for offsides, is likely, and hopefully the technology will develop.
Interestingly Webb will also meet with representatives of the Football Supporters Association in the near future.
One other important aspect is the poor behaviour of too many players at Elite level. Sadly this behaviour is copied throughout football causing huge difficulty in recruiting and retaining new referees. Over time this will have serious consequences for elite levels of the game - the great majority of PL & EFL referees come through the grass roots system.
During my years as player and spectator I’ve witnessed a wide range of refereeing styles but at local level the worst games were those with no official referee and a ‘volunteer’ replacement.
Thats fair! I think I just get upset is when people dont liek VAR than moan about referee peformance without it. In fact id have more sympathy if people moaned at refs who have the joy of VAR. Not defending teh weekend decisions becuase of course they were badI am very happy to have more wrong decisions if it makes the game better overall.