forestzoe
Jack Burkitt
Sorry that was in reply to Maxi, quote didn't stick for some reason
Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
still 8 month ban appears a little excessive. Fine him 8 weeks wages and give him a 4/6 game ban. Donate that fee to anti-betting groups or rehabs etc..
Make you wonder if FA have sought to help him, does he need support? is an average of one bet per week excessive? Could 8 months not being able to do his job drive him to look at other ways (gambling) to pass the time. I don't think the punishment is fit for the offence.
It would have been shameful if they were playing a relegation rival next. Arsenal have blown the title now but again they faced Brentford with Toney and City face them without.We should probably be grateful that Brentford don’t have any remaining games against teams down the bottom though.
Joey Barton got 18 months. I think it was reduced in the end8 month ban (really 5 months of playing time) is still really harsh.
All for a few bets, Mitrovic got 8 games for pushing a referee, Trippier got 10 weeks for a blatent no lose bet for a mate.
Hate the inconsistency from those in charge of the league, wouldn't have been 8 months if in a top 4 side.
Makes you wonder what punishment will be dished out to Everton come judgement day. (see this has been palmed off already!)
It was, reduced to 13 months I think.Joey Barton got 18 months. I think it was reduced in the end
Maybe jamie vardy will have another watchalong partyImagine being a Leicester fan. Gotta wait until Monday night and might be down by then.
Apparently the ban was going to be 6 months but due to the timing of it he gets an extra few months as he'll be off anyway. Don't know how true that is.That is poor.
8 months of which at least 2 there is no football?
He shouldn't have been playing for the last 8 months, not the next 8.
Gutless tossers at the FA
I was wondering whether they waiting to see how the season panned out before announcing the ban, their last game was against West Ham who could've still technically gone down at the time. It might've opened up a whole new can of worms if they faced a Toney-less Brentford and the rest of us didn't.On the brightside any minor lingering hope of Arsenal getting the title has just evaporated knowing that Man City will be playing a Toneyless Brentford on the last day of the season.
It's not inconsistent or harsh at all, Trippier told a mate he wasn't going to Athletico? And they placed loads of money down, he literally had no control over that and confided on a close friend and got essentially a 2.5 month ban, Toney placed just under 250 bets on football and gets 3x the ban of Trippier. The 50k fee is pathetic may as well not bother, 3 days training and he's earnt that back.8 month ban (really 5 months of playing time) is still really harsh.
All for a few bets, Mitrovic got 8 games for pushing a referee, Trippier got 10 weeks for a blatent no lose bet for a mate.
Hate the inconsistency from those in charge of the league, wouldn't have been 8 months if in a top 4 side.
Makes you wonder what punishment will be dished out to Everton come judgement day. (see this has been palmed off already!)
Betting on your own team is soft match fixing, it's right they throw the book at him.still 8 month ban appears a little excessive. Fine him 8 weeks wages and give him a 4/6 game ban. Donate that fee to anti-betting groups or rehabs etc..
Make you wonder if FA have sought to help him, does he need support? is an average of one bet per week excessive? Could 8 months not being able to do his job drive him to look at other ways (gambling) to pass the time. I don't think the punishment is fit for the offence.