RedDogChris
RedDogChris
That went under the radar with me too, good luck to the man. One of the better recent managers until Mr Cooper came along of course
I hope he does well too.
For me he was the last 1/2 decent manger we had before Coops.
He had his "issues" of course but I always felt there was a fierce competitive core there and I could see what he was trying to do with the team even though he was a bit profligate with money.
I wonder what might have happened if we hadn't had the meltdown and he'd been with us for a couple more seasons, perhaps with Marinakis at his back?
.
I wonder what might have happened if we hadn't had the meltdown and he'd been with us for a couple more seasons, perhaps with Marinakis at his back?
He was a good guy but he had no answer when Plan A started to fail. I feel Kranky was the better manager and would have finished top 6 in the same season where O'Neil came in and fell short.I still will love Sabri forever tho
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I still will love Sabri forever tho
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We'd have spent a lot of money, and had an even more massive squad.
We would have been in the playoffs at the least.
We would have been in the playoffs at the least. His players played for him.
Possibly, but AK had us finish 17th in his first season here.
In his last run of games we were placed 7th, 7th, 7th, 10th, 10th, 7th
And then I look at his time at Birmingham.
I'm not seeing anything there which says playoffs would have been assured at all.
I hope he does well too.
For me he was the last 1/2 decent manger we had before Coops.
He had his "issues" of course but I always felt there was a fierce competitive core there and I could see what he was trying to do with the team even though he was a bit profligate with money.
I wonder what might have happened if we hadn't had the meltdown and he'd been with us for a couple more seasons, perhaps with Marinakis at his back?
He spent 26m, more than any manager we've had in recent years and more than most clubs in this league. We should have been in the playoffs all season at that amount of money.I think it was the 3-3 at Norwich which took the wheels off though. Before that we were doing reasonably well and then it appeared something happened, though he only had a couple more matches after then.
Karanka did a lot to make us much more solid and harder to beat or concede (though we did draw 5-5 with Villa) which was progress from a more free-scoring (and free-conceding) Warburton side, and took a while to get going, when a manager comes in midseason like that they normally have to spend a while sorting out the reasons why the other one got sacked...
He spent 26m, more than any manager we've had in recent years and more than most clubs in this league. We should have been in the playoffs all season at that amount of money.
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
He spent 26m, more than any manager we've had in recent years and more than most clubs in this league. We should have been in the playoffs all season at that amount of money.
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
I don't think the amount he spent was too much really. It was showing signs of clicking as we were flirting with the top 6 most of that season before he quit, and probably would have had enough to get through.
The issue we had was that we'd gone from a manager who still has a total lack of defensive organisation to one who based his teams on it. It was the right move but needed a shift on the playing side as MW couldn't spot a defender or organise a defence (who found Rob Dickie for him?).
That first deadline day was crazy, I think that day we brought in Pantilimon, Lolley, Watson, Colback, Tomlin, a few others who didn't do much, and I think we were close to getting Dawson as well (as opposed to when he did eventually come in).
I think most of those were free or loans so didn't cost us a lot, the window after we got Carvalho in for 13m (enough has been said about that fee), and Grabban 6m would have taken up a lot of the 26m you mentioned on 2 players (which really did include the two lads on loan as well as it was mooted as a Mendes fee).
But ultimately either way the squad needed replacing as at that point it was still full of rubbish brought in 2016 summer and a lot of MW's signings were terrible too.
The issue was then that rather than sticking straight off with a replacement similar to AK we then went for O'Neill who was still preferring 4-4-2 when most of the league moved away from it, and not heading for a more similar replacement (which admittedly we did in the summer, I don't think he was available in January)... and if we had been under a similar setup to the one with the CEO in charge rather than just appointing random managers when AK did leave we probably would have made the play offs.
For all his status and track record I'd say MO'N is the manager appointed under EM who has progressed the club the least. Hughton is close, but did start the defensive solidity we have now, certainly under Lamouchi we were still a bit fragile at the back...
If we spent the same amount of money on the current 11 as we did under Karanka we would of won this league by Christmas.
Did Aitor spend that though? We all know Aitor was fecked over by the club with Transfers. Most of the players he didnt want. Besides Grabban I would say Aitor didnt want any of those players.
Whether he wanted them or not his squad cost £26m plus loan fees and high earning players like Pantillimon, he also signed around 40 players in 2 windows.Did Aitor spend that though? We all know Aitor was fecked over by the club with Transfers. Most of the players he didnt want. Besides Grabban I would say Aitor didnt want any of those players.
Whether he wanted them or not his squad cost £26m plus loan fees and high earning players like Pantillimon, he also signed around 40 players in 2 windows.
Even 6m on Grabban is more than Warburton, Copper, Sabri, Hughton spent (i think).
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
There's no way we spent 5m on Arter and 38k in wages.. The fee for Soh is also not going to be right.
Fair enough about 19/20 we spent 7m mainly in the January window, when we missed out on the playoffs marginally, so spent around 1/3 to 1/4 of what AK did to match/beat him.
Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk
Still though just because money is spent it dosent mean it's a better side. Carvalho was not worth 13.5 million and Aitor I can not for life of me think that he wanted him for that much. Especially as he was a Tomlin fan boy.
Honestly seeing how we used Mendes for a few managers to get players I can't lay that spend catastophe at Karanka's door. In fact his favs were Colback, Tomlin and Grabban were all great value. We just have to agree to disagree.