• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Standard of Referees (Sponsored by Steven Reid)

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
Stuart Atwell, the Frank Spencer of football Referees.
 

Red Ray's Redlist

Viv Anderson
I agree with MaxiRobriguez. There are 2 competing principles at play which make a mockery of the way VAR is used in the Prem. Referees are not making decisions because VAR will capture any errors. But VAR won't overturn decisions unless there is a clear and obvious error (or it would benefit Forest), but the threshold for clear and obvious is ridiculously high so they Don embarrass their mates.

You'd think if you're in the middle of all this it would be clear and obvious that it was making them look ridiculous. Instead they've doubled down.

The solution would be for ref's to describe incidents and the reason for their decision to the VAR official so they can actually see if something was missed. It works wellin rugby, and they often do it as play develops, not just in the breaks.

In an ideal world this description would be shared with the fans too.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
Idon't see why they need all the legal mumbo-jumbo to try and make the system work. just have it on an open basis.

The ref runs the game on the field, but VAR can tell him at any time, if they think it necessary, of something they have spotted or something he appears to have get wrong. He can chose to ignore them, but why must they have all this nonsense about how and when they may take part?

The Boly incident is a prime example.
 

PynchonForest

John Robertson
What would massively help referees is for there to actually be 2 of them out on the pitch. We're asking non athlete blokes in their 40's to keep up with the pace of a Premier League game which gets faster year on year. I think even basketball has a couple of refs which is played on a small court. Simply have a ref in each half of the pitch, and as the ball crosses halfway control switches to the other ref.

Not only would this allow refs to keep up with the game, it will allow them to be positioned better and be closer to play. Another major benefit will be having refs far less fatigued and we all know fatigue plays a huge part in decision making
Fair point. But you look at Rosato and how he performed in a Champions League quarter final and age and running are not always big factors. Though Taylor is sometimes a bit lazy, his running is very good for his age. And Attwell's running is excellent. But his brain is nowhere near up to it. There is a over emphasis on running with younger referees and while fitness and running are important, if the decision making is wrong then neither of those things matter much.

Having said all of that. I think two referees on the pitch is a great idea, and I think it will happen once they deep six ARs, which is going to happen sometime soon. Five years max, I figure.
 

PynchonForest

John Robertson
Attwell, in the center of controversy , yet again. And yet someone a few pages back said I ALWAYS take the referee's side. Apparently, that person (I honestly forget who it was) is a rather selective reader.

I have been critical of referees many times. I just don't agree with a fair chunk of the criticism thrown their way on this board. The ref is the easiest guy to blame when things go wrong. A reasonable amount of the time, deservedly so. Just as often, no chance.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
Good old Pynchon. Even on here the ref takes the flak! It has forever been thus, though, even when I was a youngster, we were taking pot shots at the ref. An easy target, but in those days we just took it out on him because he was the one in control and the one with whom we could agree was wrong.

But these days when we have so many cameras showing the events on the pitch, there is nowhere to hide. And recently the decisions have been pretty poor, both by the onfield refs and the VAR cubbyhole.

I'm convinced that refs are assessed by how they control the players and how they dress and behave on the pitch. Not by how many decisions they get right or wrong.
 

Flaggers

May not be the best moderator on LTLF, but he's...
LTLF Minion
I wonder if their various employer, Sky, might have put some pressure on them to speak as they have - protecting the status quo protects the Sky Sports brand.....
 

Apollo11

First Team Squad
A guy who ended a fellow professionals career because of something he shouted to him......f*** listening to anything he says
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
Yes I don't think we need to take lectures on class from Roy Keane much in the same way we wouldn't need medic lectures from Harold Shipman.
 

Irish Wolf

First Team Squad
I wouldn't worry about Roy Keane. Great footballer, shit human being.

Many of us Irish laugh at his emotionless, hard man attitude on British TV. If he tried that nonsense over here he would be told to take his face for a shite.
 

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
Sounds to me like Roy can stick his opinions up his bollocks?
 

Thomas

AMERICAN IDIOT
The media being against us actually makes me extremely angry. They can stick their opinions where the sun doesn’t f***ing shine, dickheads.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Col Steve Austin

Viv Anderson
Athletic article lamenting poor Attwell's treatment and suggesting that the VAR at Wolves shouldn't have intervened so as not to cause him more embarrassment:


Nothing about that decision confirming his errors at Everton.

I thought the Athletic was better than that.
 

Robertson

Viv Anderson
Athletic article lamenting poor Attwell's treatment and suggesting that the VAR at Wolves shouldn't have intervened so as not to cause him more embarrassment:


Nothing about that decision confirming his errors at Everton.

I thought the Athletic was better than that.
To be fair, VAR shouldn’t have intervened at Wolves. But I can’t state strongly enough how that reason shouldn’t have been “so as not to cause Stuart Atwell further embarrassment”.
 

Notcher

Stuart Pearce
Athletic article lamenting poor Attwell's treatment and suggesting that the VAR at Wolves shouldn't have intervened so as not to cause him more embarrassment:


Nothing about that decision confirming his errors at Everton.

I thought the Athletic was better than that.
So the athletic are promoting that the PGMOL should indulge in conscious bias. Can these idiots genuinely not see what they are saying?
 

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
Clearly, The Athletic knows which side its bread is buttered!
 
Top Bottom