If he was on a Fixed term contract then not really, they have to financially compensate the club to break the deal or we could sue him for breach of contract.Compensation for a technical director? That's odd.
If he was on a Fixed term contract then not really, they have to financially compensate the club to break the deal or we could sue him for breach of contract.Compensation for a technical director? That's odd.
Thats a shame. He may as well have not joined us, leaving so soon
He’s had more clubs than Tiger Woods
Surprised he's leaving before this 'project' comes to fruition.
I've always been skeptical about the DOF structure, but it's even more bizare if they're constantly changing for whatever reason.
The idea that we're gonna have some bloke in place to oversee managers change whilst retaining a stylistic identity has been proven false twice in a short period now. What's the point? If they're as interchangeable as managers, it's a waste of time.
Good riddance. Employ a good manager, back that manager. That's all that's needed. Spend Dowlings wage on some good scouts instead.
I've always been skeptical about the DOF structure, but it's even more bizare if they're constantly changing for whatever reason.
The idea that we're gonna have some bloke in place to oversee managers change whilst retaining a stylistic identity has been proven false twice in a short period now. What's the point? If they're as interchangeable as managers, it's a waste of time.
Good riddance. Employ a good manager, back that manager. That's all that's needed. Spend Dowlings wage on some good scouts instead.
Balti pie is outside amd wants to know what the hell you're talking aboutOr better pie fillings
Agree, never been convinced by a DOF structure at Karankas Forest anyway. He's come in & set his own tone with the playing style, so you'd assume the way to go is for Karanka to staff it too. Is there much left for a DOF to do?
Balti pie is outside amd wants to know what the hell you're talking about
It allows Aitor to focus on managing the first team rather than having to spread his time over the wider aspects of running the club.
Fair point, genuine question, did Dowling have any authority over Karanka?
When did steak and kidney go out of fashion?
A structure relying only on the manager and the Board is not safe. A decision maker or at least influencer between the two is necessary. It is irrelevant if he is a DoF working closely with the manager or a football technocrat working closely with the Board; what is important is to have a third pole of power.I've always been skeptical about the DOF structure, but it's even more bizare if they're constantly changing for whatever reason.
The idea that we're gonna have some bloke in place to oversee managers change whilst retaining a stylistic identity has been proven false twice in a short period now. What's the point? If they're as interchangeable as managers, it's a waste of time.
Good riddance. Employ a good manager, back that manager. That's all that's needed. Spend Dowlings wage on some good scouts instead.
A structure relying only on the manager and the Board is not safe. A decision maker or at least influencer between the two is necessary. It is irrelevant if he is a DoF working closely with the manager or a football technocrat working closely with the Board; what is important is to have a third pole of power.
Fair point, genuine question, did Dowling have any authority over Karanka?
Back on topic.
I've some knowledge in this area & can confirm S&K is still very much a player.
Beef in Ale remains the benchmark though.
With Beef & Stilton & Chicken & Mushroom on the rise.
A structure relying only on the manager and the Board is not safe. A decision maker or at least influencer between the two is necessary. It is irrelevant if he is a DoF working closely with the manager or a football technocrat working closely with the Board; what is important is to have a third pole of power.
A structure relying only on the manager and the Board is not safe. A decision maker or at least influencer between the two is necessary. It is irrelevant if he is a DoF working closely with the manager or a football technocrat working closely with the Board; what is important is to have a third pole of power.
Surely ultimately the owner decides the policy of the club. If you have a dickhead like Fawaz in charge the whole club is going to be Mickey Mouse.
If you have, as we now seem to have, an owner who knows how to do the right thing, then you are going to have good people running the affairs behind the scenes and I think too many cooks spoil the broth.
As Alf says, each has an opinion, who wins out when there is a difference? The DOF only chooses the players, the coach/manager has to put it into operation so why not buy his choices? The finance people can veto the choice, but why should a non-playing type? If the coach gets it wrong, his head is on the block and, anyway, it's the owners fault in that case for employing a dunderhead.