Bonfy177
LTLF MORON
Premature eh? We’ve all been there.
Speak for yoPremature eh? We’ve all been there.
Yet more fake news then.
What was fake about it?Yet more fake news then.
I could see the validity of a player being sin-binned, as happens in Ice Hockey and Rugby of course.Genuine question, is the opposition here to a blue card or to the idea of a temporary exclusion from the field of play - or sin-binning?
I haven't formed an onion for myself, but I've been thinking about the 2nd yellow and how there is a different threshold in practice from a 1st yellow, probably because it's impact is massive.
This comes after the Bournemouth game where many felt Kluivert should have walked but the ref appeared to have extended more leniency because he was on a yellow.
But if you strip away the recency bias this second card leniency is a known phenomenon in the game.
Does the sin-bin fit in here?
I'm surprised you're back in for seconds already. Are you sure you're not faking it?Can we get back to the “premature“ quote ……we’ve all been there ain’t we? Or is it just me again ?
I love it man, I normally pay for this sort of treatment , get it fer nowt here.I'm surprised you're back in for seconds already. Are you sure you're not faking it?
The original report (below the headline at the top) suggests it could be trialled in top level football next season i.e the FA Cup (I’d call that misleading,fake and clickbait).What was fake about it?
In the article quoted in the first post it saysThe original report (below the headline at the top) suggests it could be trialled in top level football next season i.e the FA Cup (I’d call that misleading,fake and clickbait).
The FIFA response suggests to me we are nowhere near implementation in elite football.
though Fifa, the global governing body, have since said it would be “premature” to involve elite competitions in the trials
The Football Association was reported to be exploring the possibility of using the FA Cup as part of the trials process, though Fifa, the global governing body, have since said it would be “premature” to involve elite competitions in the trials.
The trials have not been authorised for top-level competitions, however, meaning there will be no sin-bins in the Premier League, and the proposals have not met with support from Uefa who have no plans to roll out sin-bins to either this summer’s men’s European Championship or the Champions League.
Why does the headline suggest that it could be used in the FA Cup next season?In the article quoted in the first post it says
Is that your defence? "It was the headline wot done it"Why does the headline suggest that it could be used in the FA Cup next season?
It's consistent what is in the article.The new Ifab plans could be trialled in next season’s FA Cup
Sponserd by Everton fans?I wonder if Konate will be suing the beeb?
At 7:40 this morning the blue card idea was prefaced with a large image of Konate beshown a blue card.
At 8:40 the image had been cropped to eliminate the Player's name.
Fake news and AI mock ups on our National Broadcaster?
This country is well f**ked up.
P.S.: i did have a great money spinning idea for the impoverished world of professional football: there are no adverts on the current yellow and red cards. Opportunity going begging!
I could see the validity of a player being sin-binned, as happens in Ice Hockey and Rugby of course.
This would, as you say, potentially deal with the still-frequent annoyance of a player on a yellow card seemingly being given leniency by the match official, if he commits a second foul that might be a very minor offence, but potentially - had he not already been carded - worthy of a yellow in itself.
The problem is though, would there be a scenario where it goes mad, and you end up with eight v nine for chunks of the game, and players wandering on and off the pitch.
And of course. The obvious one - what happens if a goalie gets sin-binned? Does an outfield player go in goal until the goalie comes back on?
But the chief executive of the FA, Mark Bullingham, who sits on the board of the Ifab, has defended the innovation. “The success of sin-bins in the grassroots game has been prevention, rather than cure,” he said in December. “You get to a point where players know the threat of sin-bins, so don’t transgress. And we would hope that it would make the same change [higher up the game].”
Meanwhile, grassroots referee Andrew says he is pro blue cards: "It definitely helps. It's not the panacea, but it definitely helps you manage your game. And it's more, for me, the threat of using it than actually using it. I mean, I've done probably over 100 games this season, 80 as a referee, and I think I've used two or three sin bins, but I probably threatened to use them every other game.
"So you can see from that the threat works. And usually it's the players from their own team who help to manage it by telling the player to shut up. So in the end, it works. You don't have to use the sin bin. The players manage it and it definitely helps. No doubt about it."
FIFA are merely dancing to the Media Moghuls' tune.Worra bag o bollocks
Almost as if the Refs are so shit at applying yellow cards for dissent ect that they're trying circumnavigate it by introducing another level of bollocks & confusion
All the problems with modern football I could sort out during me tea break, I don't know what FIFA ect are pissing about at