• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Financial Fair Play (FFP)

Villa_Fan

First Team Squad
Sadly Ipswich will probably find that they will be too when PSR hits for the year of allowable losses hits for their league 1 season. Either that or they spend nothing and potentially go back down, probably being worse than Sheff Utd.
There is no transfer spend cap in League one. Birmingham City can go out and buy Mbappe, Kane and Haaland if they want however they do have a % of revenue spend on wages cap which would hurt them. I am. not sure how the ruling works and how much allocation PSR allows for League 1
 

Mr. Blonde

Jack Burkitt
Surely Forest were told of the result prior to the 'official' announcement. Either way, it was only an hour or so, it is nearly impossible to fully contain information where there are many people and parties involved.
It might have been a few hours but either way I think it's a non-issue, the club were probably told at the same time of the leak as you say, it's not like it got leaked days beforehand
 

Villa_Fan

First Team Squad
It might have been a few hours but either way I think it's a non-issue, the club were probably told at the same time of the leak as you say, it's not like it got leaked days beforehand
I agree, for all we know the leak could have come form within Forest LOL
 

Project Zeus

Steve Chettle
Had a skim of the report and honestly CBA to read it all properly. This made me laugh though:

View attachment 39036
In other words, don’t ever hope for any consistency or try and appeal against precedent in the future, we absolutely reserve the right to continue to make this up as we go along .
Christ, who wrote that? The first sentence looks like something I'd type after ten beers.

Sent from my SM-G990B using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:

Lady Penelope

First Team Squad
I am not at all impressed with the way the EPL conduct matters. I see the wisdom in having a set of financial rules that is designed to stop rogue owners running clubs into the dust. Unfortunately the present set of regulations does have other consequences, whether unintended or not, the Sky Six hold the cards. However, at some point after Wembley a conversation like this took place .....

EFL Congratulations on your promotion to the Premier League.
NFFC Thank you.
EFL Now there are things you have to have in place. Some you might already have but since it's been 23 years since you were last here, please note the following: there are minimum standards to do with floodlights, TV gallery, press facilities, VAR, and much more.
NFFC Understood. Where we need to bring it up to date we will do so.
EPL OK then there are the financial regulations.
NFFC Yes, got that. Understood and agreed.
EPL OK, sign here please then here's your cheque.

Either NFFC can't read, can't count or tried to push the boundaries. Either way, I am not at all impressed with the club. Twenty three years outside the top flight and they have stupidly put it at risk.

Looking ahead, the EPL are hopefully learning about how their regulations favour some over others, and how their PR is lacking so that they are perceived as bent. NFFC are hopefully learning that rights and responsibilities go together.

I am sure that most of the Premier League teams would much prefer the likes of Forest, Leeds and so on in there. The EPL too will be mindful of the global reach (and therefore the TV money) of Forest, Leeds etc over other teams currently in the EPL, so I don't subscribe to the view that they are out to get us and to get us out, however petulantly the club behaves. The rules are far from perfect, but we signed up to them and that is how the world works.

Next season, hopefully as a PL club, let there be no messing, no wasting money on expensive loans who don't play, no buggering about by chopping and changing key personnel behind the scenes, no more PR nonsense about 'announcements about announcements', and just win some games and win them with a bit of style. All of that would feel like progress, like we are growing up as an EPL club, like we mean business.

I'd better go and do some work now .....
 

HBB

Jack Burkitt
Again with my ex-journo hat on - It's standard practice for organisations to release statements like this early to media outlets on an embargoed basis - the quid pro quo being "we'll let you know early so when the embargo deadline passes you can publish more substantial reports but don't break the news itself before the appointed time". This was fine in the old days but of course the internet has blown this wide open so embargo periods are much shorter than in days gone by.

For your coverage you'd had/have to usually get info for your piece by talking to an interested party for their comment for reaction, technically this third party are not covered by the embargo but you'd have a gentlemen's agreement for that person to not phone their mate once they've given their quote or reaction - especially if it can be traced back to you/your organisation as that would risk the original organisation no longer giving you embargoed info... but its all gone to buggery now so if Orstein released something an hour before its almost certain that the PL didn't release the info about the points until about that time.
 
Last edited:

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
„Big“ Evangelos is too busy kicking f*** out of his television at the moment to make a public statement.
 

Dirk Furtull

John Robertson
Oh well, at least Nuno can stop whinging on about not knowing the outcome and actually concentrate on where it matters, on the pitch.

Sent from my LE2113 using Tapatalk
 

Notcher

Stuart Pearce
Again with my ex-journo hat on - It's standard practice for organisations to release statements like this early to media outlets on an embargoed basis - the quid pro quo being "we'll let you know early so when the embargo deadline passes you can publish more substantial reports but don't break the news itself before the appointed time". This was fine in the old days but of course the internet has blown this wide open so embargo periods are much shorter than in days gone by.

For your coverage you'd had/have to usually get info for your piece by talking to an interested party for their comment for reaction, technically this third party are not covered by the embargo but you'd have a gentlemen's agreement not for that person to phone their mate once they've given their quote or reaction - especially if it can be traced back to you/your organisation as that would risk the original organisation no longer giving you embargoed info... but its all gone to buggery now so if Orstein released something an hour before its almost certain that the PL didn't release the info about the points until about that time.

Cheers HBB, nice insight. It was between 1 and 2 hours between Ornstein releasing his piece and it being officially released by the PL. With your knowledge, would that be a breach of embargo and what would the repercussions be if it was?
 

JonnoSnr

Youth Team
Apart from the obvious inequality that PSR is maintaining for the EPL and keeping weighted in favour of the "established" teams - I don't really understand why they didn't just make it the obvious allowance of £105 for any promoted teams over 3 years.... Surely that would be more fair?
I suppose the argument is then that would result in some Championship clubs gambling on promotion (even more than they do already) knowing they could go 'hell for leather' in the EFL and if they go up then the PL money will just wipe out any problems. If they didn't succeed it might result in some clubs going under.

To be honest it's all a mess. I understand the need for some sort of system to regulate the money in the game as it's ludicrous frankly and if nothing was in place Newcastle could just get a front 3 of Mbappe/Haaland/Kane and stick them all £5m a week.

But there needs to be something more even for promoted clubs. Surely the 3 year period should just begin there and then as comparing financials in the Championship and the Premier League is like chalk and cheese. Ipswich might struggle as a result of this next season although to be fair they're coming up with a much more settled squad than ours was.
 

HBB

Jack Burkitt
Cheers HBB, nice insight. It was between 1 and 2 hours between Ornstein releasing his piece and it being officially released by the PL. With your knowledge, would that be a breach of embargo and what would the repercussions be if it was?
Technically yes a break of embargo but an embargo isn't a legal device, its just a request really. And, no, no real repercussions any more - as I said previously you could be taken of the distribution list for embargoed materials but that was in the old days when it was much harder to get news out early (radio only, really) and it was easier to trace back to someone/an organisation that had broken the embargo. Now with the Wild West that is the internet and being able to break with a single tweet its impossible.

While I would expect Forest to know at the earliest date as they were a party in the appeal, the release to the "media" will almost certainly have happened at the time of the first reports breaking by twitter etc.
 
This Bepe is continuing the long line of good elsewhere, rubbish here theme. Did he serve any purpose in the end? We only got 2 points less due to complying with the Premier league, nothing he did.

I'd be checking to see if he's a Mendez client?



Sent from my EVR-L29 using Tapatalk
 

Shearstone

Misses the champ
So the rules were made to avoid a Portsmouth bankruptcy scenario and we held out for more money for our star player, secured more money and got punished...hmmm. Good one Premier League. What a bunch of c***s.
Well the commissions view is that had we complied from the beginning we wouldn't have had to sell Johnson so it's irrelevant when we sold him.
 

Notcher

Stuart Pearce
I suppose the argument is then that would result in some Championship clubs gambling on promotion (even more than they do already) knowing they could go 'hell for leather' in the EFL and if they go up then the PL money will just wipe out any problems. If they didn't succeed it might result in some clubs going under.

To be honest it's all a mess. I understand the need for some sort of system to regulate the money in the game as it's ludicrous frankly and if nothing was in place Newcastle could just get a front 3 of Mbappe/Haaland/Kane and stick them all £5m a week.

But there needs to be something more even for promoted clubs. Surely the 3 year period should just begin there and then as comparing financials in the Championship and the Premier League is like chalk and cheese. Ipswich might struggle as a result of this next season although to be fair they're coming up with a much more settled squad than ours was.
It seems utterly bizarre that teams are given parachute payments for adjustment after being relegated but they won't allow an an accounting adjustment to the permitted losses for the accounting period when you get promoted.
 

Rosie

Viv Anderson
Although I do agree with you.
Don't forget the points deducted are points which were earned for results on the pitch.
Still what is done is done.
Let's make it a cracking atmosphere on Saturday - I hope that we all pull together including Forza Garibaldi with an inspiring display - and do whatever is necessary (win/draw) to secure our safety so we can celebrate with a few beers after the game.
Yes the points were earned on the pitch, but my point (which I wasn’t 100% clear about -apologies) was that we stay up DESPITE their deduction; and if that p****s off the Premier League, so much the better.
 
Top Bottom