• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Financial Fair Play (FFP)

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
Everyone wants the club to be run properly - or at least I hope they do.
It is also not wrong to acknowledge, that although mistakes have been made, it is because of the owner that we are now an EPL club swimming against the tide of the establishment trying to become one of them.
But it's not.

The owner walked away from the club when it was bottom of the Champ, and left Murphs to run it on a budget.

It's despite the owner that we are in the EPL.
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
I am not going there with you again Alfie
Unless I am wrong EM employed Murphy and gave him his money as a budget to work with.
But he, and his close cohorts, had no direct involvement with footballing matters for promotion, and the budget was very modest compared to when they got involved again.

Marinakis may have owned the club when we got promoted, but he and his cohorts - the people heavily involved since promotion - didn't oversee promotion. That's the key thing here.

When they were overseeing us, they took us to the Championship relegation places.

They are shit at making direct footballing decisions, and should leave that to the professionals. That's good leadership. Not trying to micromanage something which you don't understand.
 
Last edited:

PlayedOnGrass

First Team Squad
But he, and his close cohorts, had no direct involvement with footballing matters for promotion, and the budget was very modest compared to when they got involved again.

Marinakis may have owned the club when we got promoted, but he and his cohorts - the people heavily involved since promotion - didn't oversee promotion.

When they were overseeing us, they took us to the Championship relegation places.

They are shit at making direct footballing decisions, and should leave that to the professionals. That's good leadership. Not trying to micromanage something which you don't understand.
It was a simple question that required a Yes or No answer.
 

Flaggers

May not be the best moderator on LTLF, but he's...
LTLF Minion

redodare

First Team Squad
But he, and his close cohorts, had no direct involvement with footballing matters for promotion, and the budget was very modest compared to when they got involved again.

Marinakis may have owned the club when we got promoted, but he and his cohorts - the people heavily involved since promotion - didn't oversee promotion. That's the key thing here.

When they were overseeing us, they took us to the Championship relegation places.

They are shit at making direct footballing decisions, and should leave that to the professionals. That's good leadership. Not trying to micromanage something which you don't understand.
It's a classic business mistake, especially in the entertainment industries where vanity projects prevail.
Doesn't make the owners evil . Indeed, their aims do seem honourable: Grow the status of the club . Grow the value of their investment. Most fans would see achivement of these goals being in there interests

But beholden on us to highlight when they get it wrong . More galling when they show signs of getting it right but then panic at the first bumps along the way.

I do hope that the fan advisory boards make these points clearly. Bring in some more experience and listen to them.

I wonder how the new COO is getting on? All been a bit quiet since initial fanfare.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
I am not going there with you again Alfie
Unless I am wrong EM employed Murphy and gave him his money as a budget to work with.

That doesn't make him personally responsible for the promotion delivery by the operational team.

I own a reasonable amount of equity in a company who's share price has grown 39% in the three years since it went public. I have done nothing but bought the shares and provided an element of market confidence by holding onto the shares. Am I responsible for the operational success of that business? Yes or no?

And for balance: Marinakis is not personally responsible for the failure of the Hughton tenure either.
 

ARedChester

First Team Squad
No - the rules remained the same.
We were told by the EPL that they would not accept our EFL accounts for 2021/2022 (£30m - promotion bonus's & COVID) 4 weeks before the end of the 2022/23 accounting period.
I assume that these were accepted by the EFL as this had not been raised as an issue any time previously.
This is clear and written in the released report - nothing for bonus's and 12m reduced to 2m for COVID - informed on 8th June 2023
Like you POG, I am struggling to understand why one set of finances, previously accepted under the rules we were governed in the EFL by are now not acceptable for the PL.

Once those EFL submissions are endorsed and accepted, there should be nothing to challenge - we were EFL at the time. A statement from the club would be lovely to explain this, and other aspects of it all.
 

PlayedOnGrass

First Team Squad
That doesn't make him personally responsible for the promotion delivery by the operational team.

I own a reasonable amount of equity in a company who's share price has grown 39% in the three years since it went public. I have done nothing but bought the shares and provided an element of market confidence by holding onto the shares. Am I responsible for the operational success of that business? Yes or no?

And for balance: Marinakis is not personally responsible for the failure of the Hughton tenure either.
You contradict yourself.
You rightly said - you bought the shares and did nothing more - you didn't employ the people who are running the company - so rightly you get no credit for the companies performance
EM bought the club, has invested over £100m of his own money and put the team in place to gain promotion - but he deserves no credit for this?
 

congo_red_49

Ale Ape
You rightly said - you bought the shares and did nothing more - you didn't employ the people who are running the company - so rightly you get no credit for the companies performance
Doesn't that depend on the particular company? One that I hold shares in gives me voting rights regarding officer appointments.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
EM bought the club, has invested over £100m of his own money and put the team in place to gain promotion - but he deserves no credit for this?

This isn't true.

EM bought the club for £50m odd. That's an asset purchase, not an investment in the club. No money went in in capital injection at that point. You don't get to claim credit for buying something just because you have the money to do so :LOL:

He then did push in c.£50m in investment in terms of transfer fees and wage bill growth (including future debt write-off). That investment failed as the playing squad assembled under that investment didn't deliver promotion. The only player left from that investment in the promotion squad was Lewis Grabban.

So. Not true he's pushed £100m into the club and not true that even half that money caused us to gain promotion and so no, no credit.

If you want to pursue the "hired Dane/Cooper" angle as credit in the bank then he'll need to take responsibility for every manager he's put in place: Warburton, Karanka, MON, Lamouchi, Hughton, Cooper, Nuno as well as all the key staff appointments: Vrentzos, Randall etc.
 

Stocky Red

First Team Squad
We put these numbers in our original numbers sent in for assessment in March 2023 as agreed with the EPL - they came back to us with their 'assessment' early June 2023
It actually says all of this in the report

Yep, understand that, my point is why, at the start of the 22/23 season in the EPL, did we not take advise on whether our EFL position on COVID losses, and promotion bonuses were valid in the EPL. We were not the first club to go through this transition, and the amounts (£30M for both items combined) would have a massive impact.

If we weren't sure (or EPL/EFL conversations we ongoing in the COIVD case) then a sensible position would be to assume worse case and leave a provision in the accounts, rather than assume they were fine and spend against that.
 

lavelleuk

First Team Squad
The issue isn't "too much" investment, it's too many players every window, many of whom never play and are essentially a waste of time and money.

We often appear to just sign players because we can rather than with any real aim or purpose. This isn't just this season, this is multiple seasons which left us with a decimated squad, relying on loans (which worked), which meant we had to buy 22 players last summer.
I meant football in general, a team could buy just 1 or 2 players for huge money and be in the same position
 

Stocky Red

First Team Squad
How do you know for certain that we weren't given conflicting or unclear guidance from the EPL?

Of course I don;t know, but I think that sort of justifies my point - if you are unsure, or have conflicting information, do you assume worse case and be left with up side, or do you assume best case and be left with a penalty
 

congo_red_49

Ale Ape
Of course I don;t know, but I think that sort of justifies my point - if you are unsure, or have conflicting information, do you assume worse case and be left with up side, or do you assume best case and be left with a penalty
Depends on the exact conflict. If the EPL had given us an indication, at some point that the bonuses wouldn't count, but then told us they would at some later point, after we'd planned for them not counting, then we'd have been mislead and have every right to put out the sort of statement that we did.
Just one possible scenario - but none of us know what actually happened.
 

PlayedOnGrass

First Team Squad
This isn't true.

EM bought the club for £50m odd. That's an asset purchase, not an investment in the club. No money went in in capital injection at that point. You don't get to claim credit for buying something just because you have the money to do so :LOL:

He then did push in c.£50m in investment in terms of transfer fees and wage bill growth (including future debt write-off). That investment failed as the playing squad assembled under that investment didn't deliver promotion. The only player left from that investment in the promotion squad was Lewis Grabban.

So. Not true he's pushed £100m into the club and not true that even half that money caused us to gain promotion and so no, no credit.

If you want to pursue the "hired Dane/Cooper" angle as credit in the bank then he'll need to take responsibility for every manager he's put in place: Warburton, Karanka, MON, Lamouchi, Hughton, Cooper, Nuno as well as all the key staff appointments: Vrentzos, Randall etc.
You are playing with words
Buying / investing
Yes - he is responsible for the hiring and firing of all managers and other key appointments - what’s your point?
So all of these losses that he has covered for the last 7 years - has the magic fairy covered all of this?
 
Top Bottom