enlightened
First Team Squad
They are saying they will get 2 points.
They have already been deducted for 2 years of the 3 year cycle
Only 1 year @ 2 points per year
Maximum 2 points for us then eh!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They are saying they will get 2 points.
They have already been deducted for 2 years of the 3 year cycle
Only 1 year @ 2 points per year
They are saying they will get 2 points.
They have already been deducted for 2 years of the 3 year cycle
Only 1 year @ 2 points per year
Everton knew how much they had broken the last couple years so therefore knew what they needed to do in order to balance out the 3-year cycle (with sales/revenue) so it feels like they only have themselves to blame and why further punishment may be warranted. Same for Forest, they either balanced it out or they didn't moving forward and that will be on Forest.Everton have worked themselves into a shoot big time with it all. I can see what it’s done to our fans and forum in two months, imagine this going on for years!
I would have thought by any logic that you don’t get punished per year in a 3-year cycle, that would be ridiculous?!
You get a set loss amount per three year rolling cycle, and if you break that three year rolling cycle you get a punishment.
So if you break year 1,2, and 3, you get a punishment.
If you then break 2, 3, but not 4, however you still break over the three years - that’s another punishment.
If you break 3, but not 4, or 5, however you’re still over the three years - another punishment.
Everton chose to delay their case which should have fallen into an earlier season, so that is the bright into this year.
Then if they’ve broke the next three year cycle, another punishment. Which should be punished in isolation from to others, however maybe increased with them breaking the rules for back-to-back years.
I think you're overcomplicating it. Forget which of the 3 years is in breach. Each year a 3 year period is considered and if you breach the combined allowable losses over the relevant 3 year period you breach. That's how a rolling period works.Everton have worked themselves into a shoot big time with it all. I can see what it’s done to our fans and forum in two months, imagine this going on for years!
I would have thought by any logic that you don’t get punished per year in a 3-year cycle, that would be ridiculous?!
You get a set loss amount per three year rolling cycle, and if you break that three year rolling cycle you get a punishment.
So if you break year 1,2, and 3, you get a punishment.
If you then break 2, 3, but not 4, however you still break over the three years - that’s another punishment.
If you break 3, but not 4, or 5, however you’re still over the three years - another punishment.
Everton chose to delay their case which should have fallen into an earlier season, so that is the bright into this year.
Then if they’ve broke the next three year cycle, another punishment. Which should be punished in isolation from to others, however maybe increased with them breaking the rules for back-to-back years.
We'll stay up, then have our appeal heard and get docked more points, relegating us.Huh. Four points, and Forest will appeal. So, maybe might get a point or two back, hopefully.
Could have been worse, but drops them into the bottom three.
It‘s the Forest way!We'll stay up, then have our appeal heard and get docked more points, relegating us.
In all seriousness, in an appeal can you actually end up getting more of a punishment?We'll stay up, then have our appeal heard and get docked more points, relegating us.
YesIn all seriousness, in an appeal can you actually end up getting more of a punishment?