• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Financial Fair Play (FFP)

Eddie Yates

Steve Chettle
Re: FFP

I'm sure that we all know why some form of parachute payment has to be made. Ateam in the prem has to pay high wages and they have to assume that they are going to stay there and offer multi year contracts. If a team is relegated it may not be possible to shed some players immediately/at all so without the parachute payments, a relegated team probably wouldn't have a hope in hell of making FFP

Who f***ing cares, f*** em I say!
 

Otis Redding

Try A Little Tenderness
Re: FFP

I'm sure that we all know why some form of parachute payment has to be made. Ateam in the prem has to pay high wages and they have to assume that they are going to stay there and offer multi year contracts. If a team is relegated it may not be possible to shed some players immediately/at all so without the parachute payments, a relegated team probably wouldn't have a hope in hell of making FFP

I take your point IRTD, but how much did Aston Villa spend during both windows last season? making a complete mockery of the true intentions behind the parachute payment system, whilst the existing 21 clubs are expected to abide by the FFP rules or risk sanction.
 

Flaggers

May not be the best moderator on LTLF, but he's...
LTLF Minion
Re: FFP

What's wrong with signing a player and the contract reads "while in the premier league your pay will be xxxxxx a week. If relegated your pay will be a much smaller number than xxxxxx or you can leave."

Problem solved, parachute payments not required.
 

incapable hulk

Best served cold
Re: FFP

Or what is wrong with the Premier League saying that parachute payments can not be used towards transfer fees or wages for new players and can only be used to ease the transition to Championship football for current players and staff.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
Re: FFP

I'm another one who just doesn't buy the argument for parachute payments.

The problem is that, with all the money sloshing about the Premier League, the clubs have gone bonkers on paying high wages knowing they have a safety net. Make them exhibit financial prudence, so in the event of relegation, they can pay their bills without getting a great big handout. Similar to the Scottish situation where Nicola Sturgeon constantly harps on about her skill with money, when we just give her an enormous wad of cash every year and she spends it how she wishes whilst the rest of us pay for defence etc.
 

TonyRedForever

Youth Team
Re: FFP

Think every non relegated premier league team in the championship is sick to death of the FFP unfairness.
Maybe this time with the Olympiacos connection we can find at least 4 loopholes for bringing in quality players on loan.
 

pip

Gimp
Re: FFP

As an aside, where do we currently stand regarding FFP? Does anyone know? Are we going to suffer in the transfer market this season because of it?

It's a shame that the FA can't assess the situation a club is in when it changes hands, and essentially write-off previous financial history, or at least allow a different amount to be lost in the first season of new ownership - all on a case-by-case basis, of course.

It's not our fault Fawaz was a fuckwit :/
 

george lyall

Jack Armstrong
Re: FFP

What's wrong with signing a player and the contract reads "while in the premier league your pay will be xxxxxx a week. If relegated your pay will be a much smaller number than xxxxxx or you can leave."

Problem solved, parachute payments not required.

This would only follow the slapping down of agents, otherwise known as parasites
 

Strummer

Socialismo O Muerte!
LTLF Minion
Re: FFP

As an aside, where do we currently stand regarding FFP? Does anyone know? Are we going to suffer in the transfer market this season because of it?

It's a shame that the FA can't assess the situation a club is in when it changes hands, and essentially write-off previous financial history, or at least allow a different amount to be lost in the first season of new ownership - all on a case-by-case basis, of course.

It's not our fault Fawaz was a fuckwit :/

Reading between the lines of the new Chairman's recent letter, we may have to sell before we can buy.
 

Barry

Where's me hammer?
Re: FFP

It will be interesting to see what punishment, if any, the arbitration panel comes up with when they meet this month regarding QPR's FFP Breach in 2013-14.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39950114

It needs to be resolved this month so they know where they stand in their preparations for next season.
Itll be a fine, reduced on appeal.

My guess is 5 million which to QPR would be totally worth it
 

Flaggers

May not be the best moderator on LTLF, but he's...
LTLF Minion
Re: FFP

This would only follow the slapping down of agents, otherwise known as parasites
Where do I sign up?

Can I bring my own club with nails in ?
 

RRRREDUN

Jack Burkitt
Re: FFP

Didn't Fawaz pay off a wedge of our debt? Wasn't it not close to £17 million and brought our debt to less than £5 million? Or have I been imagining it? FFP shouldn't stop us spending £30 odd million more than we earn over the next three years. So, I don't think that FFP is a particular issue. What we want and need to do is hope season tickets go through the roof, everyone buys a shirt and our commercial side takes off.
 

I'm Red Till Dead

Stuart Pearce
Re: FFP

Didn't Fawaz pay off a wedge of our debt? Wasn't it not close to £17 million and brought our debt to less than £5 million? Or have I been imagining it? FFP shouldn't stop us spending £30 odd million more than we earn over the next three years. So, I don't think that FFP is a particular issue. What we want and need to do is hope season tickets go through the roof, everyone buys a shirt and our commercial side takes off.

This?

http://www.nottinghampost.com/fawaz-al-hasawi-writes-off-17-7m-in-loans-as-nottingham-forest-announce-losses-of-just-2-2m/story-30138140-detail/story.html
 

GreeksBearingGifts

Stuart Pearce
Re: FFP


This is interesting; it is not exactly paying back debts to third parties but writing off debts to himself. And given that this occurred in February, i.e. after the appointment of both Warburton and Samantha Gordon, who were EM's choices, I wonder if that writing off is not actually part of the takeover deal...
 

puds1970

Steve Chettle
Re: FFP

According to the post we may have to sell BB to stop us falling foul of FFP rules once again. Yet our friends down the road have the wage bill of a Hollywood blockbuster and are getting linked with multi million pound players. This is on top of making massive losses over the last couple of years.
How come the same threat doesn't seem to be lingering over them?.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 

Le Juif Rouge

Senior Mass Debater
Re: FFP

This is interesting; it is not exactly paying back debts to third parties but writing off debts to himself. And given that this occurred in February, i.e. after the appointment of both Warburton and Samantha Gordon, who were EM's choices, I wonder if that writing off is not actually part of the takeover deal...

More than likely yes. When takeovers take place all sorts of mechanisms are agreed to try and find a win-win. Both sides want as much out of it as possible and that is where the tradeoffs and sweeteners come in, and some components that you never hear about.
 

Barry

Where's me hammer?
Re: FFP

According to the post we may have to sell BB to stop us falling foul of FFP rules once again. Yet our friends down the road have the wage bill of a Hollywood blockbuster and are getting linked with multi million pound players. This is on top of making massive losses over the last couple of years.
How come the same threat doesn't seem to be lingering over them?.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Probably a half decent accountant?
 

Rzar

Bob McKinlay
Re: FFP

According to the post we may have to sell BB to stop us falling foul of FFP rules once again. Yet our friends down the road have the wage bill of a Hollywood blockbuster and are getting linked with multi million pound players. This is on top of making massive losses over the last couple of years.
How come the same threat doesn't seem to be lingering over them?.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Not just them, many other teams too. I personally think there is plenty of ways around it, we were just too lazy and incompetent to use the methods under FAH.
 

Steve B

Jack Armstrong
Re: FFP

Still not sure I've fully grasped our FFP situation.
The article says we lost £21.6m in 14-15, with Fawaz's debt write off it brought losses to £2.2m in 15-16. Does that mean we had to stay within a £6.2m loss in 16-17 or we're in trouble or have I got it wrong?
Also if Fawaz paid the debt off on Feb how is it refelected in 15-16 period?
Also when does this 3 year financial period end? We must be close to being beyond it now?
I still think it's out of order that we could be punished twice for the same period. The 14-15 loss was the one we were already punished for I thought.
I'm confused.
 

Captain Sinister

Senior doom Monger
Re: FFP

I wonder if, with the Club's new "open approach", we will get a clear statement, complete with numbers, to explain to the Club's supporters exactly what the FFP position is at the moment?
Each of us may have an opinion about where we are, but the FFP calculations are a seriously dark art, despite being subject to an apparently transparent formula for calculation.
However, as in many aspects of things that appear to be simple, the simplicity is deceptive, and all sorts of adjustments/exclusions/inclusions can be made to justify the final calculation.
One thing that does appear to me to be another factor in favour of the new owner is that he is financially literate, and also prepared to employ people who are experts to enable him to achieve his business objectives.
He is Marinakis; he delivers!

Edit: with average home attendance dropping from>23k to <20k, that would result in a loss of turnstile takings of >£1m (ex VAT) - half of the net loss.
 
Last edited:

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
Re: FFP

Or what is wrong with the Premier League saying that parachute payments can not be used towards transfer fees or wages for new players and can only be used to ease the transition to Championship football for current players and staff.

What's wrong with signing a player and the contract reads "while in the premier league your pay will be xxxxxx a week. If relegated your pay will be a much smaller number than xxxxxx or you can leave."

Problem solved, parachute payments not required.

The problem is that doesn't allow the yo-yo clubs, who are usually media & FA darings, to stay in touch with the "elite" no matter how badly they are mismanaged.

It gives us "lower" clubs half a chance, and that isn't ever gonna keep all the money in the greedy pot at the top.
 

congo_red_49

Ale Ape
Re: FFP

Still not sure I've fully grasped our FFP situation.
The article says we lost £21.6m in 14-15, with Fawaz's debt write off it brought losses to £2.2m in 15-16. Does that mean we had to stay within a £6.2m loss in 16-17 or we're in trouble or have I got it wrong?
Also if Fawaz paid the debt off on Feb how is it refelected in 15-16 period?
Also when does this 3 year financial period end? We must be close to being beyond it now?
I still think it's out of order that we could be punished twice for the same period. The 14-15 loss was the one we were already punished for I thought.
I'm confused.

Nobody grasps FFP - as it seems to be based on a set of rules that no-one can view, measuring figures that no-one has access to.
 
Top Bottom