The Commissions‘ findings are clear, and explained in the full documentation. We may not like it, but the rules are - were - clear, and Forest willingly broke them. Maybe with good reason, but, still.
Yes, we know the Premier League is artificially stacked against newly-promoted clubs, and its rules act to ring-fence the domination of the clubs whose value is the most lucrative for the Premier League‘s revenues. Forest calling this out publicly is very good to see, maybe they’ve got Alan Partridge in as a PR consultant: „Naturally, I had the last laugh“ and all that.
The PL really don‘t care about Nottingham Forest, because there is a Leicester, there is a Leeds, there is a Norwich, a Southampton, and there are a whole bunch of aspiring Championship clubs who could take their place in the top flight next season and make absolutely no impact to the money the PL „earns“, because they have built their „brand“ around the so-called „Big Six“ now.
Hence the „small clubs“ comment, by the Premier League‘s Chief Executive. He - and the PL - don‘t really care about anyone outside the scousers, the two Manchester clubs, the Arsenal, Spurs, and maybe the odd seasonal challenger (Villa this season, Newcastle last) everyone else is there as cannon fodder for those favoured clubs, effectively just in it to make up the numbers and not make a fuss, whilst trousering a healthy slice of substantial broadcast revenue. Take your payment, keep quiet and bend over for the „big clubs“.
Whilst there might be value in an appeal, do we honestly think Forest will end up better off? Having read the Commissions‘ findings, I don‘t, and it seems the Premier League were pushing for a significantly higher penalty.
Maybe Forest need to take the punishment as it is, and focus on gaining more points than Luton and Everton and Brentford, regroup in the summer, if they stay up, and go again next season, where - financially - they might be on a surer footing.
But, yeah. The Premier League does not come out of this looking good, at all. And maybe that is the best success Forest can hope for here.
Yes, we know the Premier League is artificially stacked against newly-promoted clubs, and its rules act to ring-fence the domination of the clubs whose value is the most lucrative for the Premier League‘s revenues. Forest calling this out publicly is very good to see, maybe they’ve got Alan Partridge in as a PR consultant: „Naturally, I had the last laugh“ and all that.
The PL really don‘t care about Nottingham Forest, because there is a Leicester, there is a Leeds, there is a Norwich, a Southampton, and there are a whole bunch of aspiring Championship clubs who could take their place in the top flight next season and make absolutely no impact to the money the PL „earns“, because they have built their „brand“ around the so-called „Big Six“ now.
Hence the „small clubs“ comment, by the Premier League‘s Chief Executive. He - and the PL - don‘t really care about anyone outside the scousers, the two Manchester clubs, the Arsenal, Spurs, and maybe the odd seasonal challenger (Villa this season, Newcastle last) everyone else is there as cannon fodder for those favoured clubs, effectively just in it to make up the numbers and not make a fuss, whilst trousering a healthy slice of substantial broadcast revenue. Take your payment, keep quiet and bend over for the „big clubs“.
Whilst there might be value in an appeal, do we honestly think Forest will end up better off? Having read the Commissions‘ findings, I don‘t, and it seems the Premier League were pushing for a significantly higher penalty.
Maybe Forest need to take the punishment as it is, and focus on gaining more points than Luton and Everton and Brentford, regroup in the summer, if they stay up, and go again next season, where - financially - they might be on a surer footing.
But, yeah. The Premier League does not come out of this looking good, at all. And maybe that is the best success Forest can hope for here.