• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Official Matchday Thread: Nottingham Forest v Everton: Saturday 2nd December.

FOREST vs. Everton

  • HOME Win - Forest consume Toffees

    Votes: 37 69.8%

  • AWAY Win - scalped by scousers

    Votes: 6 11.3%

  • The DRAW

    Votes: 8 15.1%

  • Scot Gemmill

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Total voters
    53
  • Poll closed .
C

coops89

First Team Squad
For those interested, Dermot Gallagher mentions in ref watch that Forest should have had a penalty. His reasoning, not just the one but three points. I never spotted the trip!

DERMOT SAYS: "I think it is a penalty for three reasons. Firstly, he never once looks at the ball, he is not interested in the ball. Secondly, I think he has his shirt for far too long, he should just feel for him, then let him go. And thirdly, he trips him as well, so I think it is a penalty."
 
Gyros Peter

Gyros Peter

Sauce salad?
coops89 said:
For those interested, Dermot Gallagher mentions in ref watch that Forest should have had a penalty. His reasoning, not just the one but three points. I never spotted the trip!

DERMOT SAYS: "I think it is a penalty for three reasons. Firstly, he never once looks at the ball, he is not interested in the ball. Secondly, I think he has his shirt for far too long, he should just feel for him, then let him go. And thirdly, he trips him as well, so I think it is a penalty."
Click to expand...
That's great, maybe tell your mates to give it next time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom