• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Official Ivan Toney day 21 - Ivan Toney vs Nottingham Forest - Ivan Toney pm Saturday 20th Ivan Toney 2024

Who will prevail in this relegation dog fight?

  • IVAN TONEY

    Votes: 9 13.2%

  • HARRY TOFFOLO

    Votes: 41 60.3%

  • Mark Warburton

    Votes: 9 13.2%

  • Onions

    Votes: 9 13.2%
  • Total voters
    68
Bonfy177

Bonfy177

LTLF MORON
Cortez the Killer said:
Letting Toney cheat so he could score on his return is the equivalent of allowing a toddler in hospital win at Ludo because it will raise his spirit. It's fuc king wrong.

Toney was banned for 8 months for breaking the laws of football. Then, in his return, in the first 20 minutes of football, the cnut goes and breaks the laws of football again. Us fans are the mugs who are punished. He should be given a retrospective ban again, otherwise it's sending out a dangerous message.

Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Ya reet Cortez 100%, you should never let a kid win at Ludo
 
Otis Redding

Otis Redding

Try A Little Tenderness
Cortez the Killer said:
Letting Toney cheat so he could score on his return is the equivalent of allowing a toddler in hospital win at Ludo because it will raise his spirit. It's fuc king wrong.

Toney was banned for 8 months for breaking the laws of football. Then, in his return, in the first 20 minutes of football, the cnut goes and breaks the laws of football again. Us fans are the mugs who are punished. He should be given a retrospective ban again, otherwise it's sending out a dangerous message.
Click to expand...
In light of the media love-in for him, has the bloke ever publicly displayed any contrition for his offences?
I'm happy to be corrected, but I'm pretty sure that I've only read that he felt unfairly treated for something that he later decided is "an addiction".
 
Rockabilly

Rockabilly

GAFF LAD. "Open your knees and feel the breeze"
Eddie Yates said:
The fact that we were naive / gormless is absolutely 100% irrelevant

Toney moved the ball from the referee's marker & he also moved the referee's marker to suit

The goal should not have stood

Anybody disagree with this?
Click to expand...
Aye... I wonder what woulda happened if it had been Man Utd or Liverpool on the receiving end. 🤔
 
Bonfy177

Bonfy177

LTLF MORON
Thing is Toney will be off at the first opportunity nailed on, they’ll spunk the money on tripe and drop out of the premier league and back into lower league mediocrity as quick as you can say BET365.

And when that happens I’ll laugh until I shat mesell.
 
Bonfy177

Bonfy177

LTLF MORON
adam09

adam09

Super Koopa
Apollo11 said:
Not read last few pages so apologies if it's been mentioned but Forest have written to the PGMOL about Toneys goal.

Edit: not letting me post links but a quick Google does the trick.
Click to expand...

Not sure if there's much point in that other than giving them a nudge to say, look that's another iffy thing that's gone against us.
 
A

ARedChester

First Team Squad
IRT Toney's moving the ball - that's fine, part of the game, every player is likely to try moving it a bit to gain a wee advantage. The absolute hideous bit for me that he should be hung for is covering up by moving the foam.

A bit like betting accounts in false names - sneaky and dirty.
 
It's Baggio

It's Baggio

John Robertson
Apollo11 said:
Not read last few pages so apologies if it's been mentioned but Forest have written to the PGMOL about Toneys goal.

Edit: not letting me post links but a quick Google does the trick.
Click to expand...

Maybe they'll write back and ask why our wall was in front of the sprayed line?
 
eyupmeduck

eyupmeduck

Geoff Thomas
Apollo11 said:
Not read last few pages so apologies if it's been mentioned but Forest have written to the PGMOL about Toneys goal.

Edit: not letting me post links but a quick Google does the trick.
Click to expand...
Not sure at which point we formally become pen pals.

Actually just not sure what the point is, if they act like they do with everything else they'll take ages to look at it, have a bit more of a discussion and then decide its a penalty to Man U.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 
V

vertigored

First Team Squad
They spoke to the ref after the match and he said it’s not for VAR to call that offence out But for the on field official.. so toney waits till the refs looking another direction, moves the ball and the foam and just gets away with it?
Surely this is one of those offences that can be punished retrospectively? Yes it doesn’t Help us but it’d make me feel better if he had another ban for cheating..dick head.
 
Morpeth

Morpeth

John Robertson
vertigored said:
They spoke to the ref after the match and he said it’s not for VAR to call that offence out But for the on field official.. so toney waits till the refs looking another direction, moves the ball and the foam and just gets away with it?
Surely this is one of those offences that can be punished retrospectively? Yes it doesn’t Help us but it’d make me feel better if he had another ban for cheating..dick head.
Click to expand...
It’s fine. Let’s just distract the ref from now on and move the ball forward 15 yards while he’s not looking. Perfectly reasonable.
 
A

Apollo11

First Team Squad
adam09 said:
Not sure if there's much point in that other than giving them a nudge to say, look that's another iffy thing that's gone against us.
Click to expand...

It could also been seen as pointing out how crap VAR and the whole process is so they go and review it and put something in place which is fair and works.
 
Barry

Barry

Where's me hammer?
Erik said:
They're not stupid. They'd have stopped it happening in the first place.
Click to expand...
This.

So naive from us, if that would have been rat faced Fernández at United he'd have been in the refs face.... i didn't watch it so who the f*** was our captain and why didn't he do his job properly?

Sent from my SM-A217F using Tapatalk
 
magicwoand

magicwoand

It tizwas it is
Eddie Yates said:
The fact that we were naive / gormless is absolutely 100% irrelevant

Toney moved the ball from the referee's marker & he also moved the referee's marker to suit

The goal should not have stood

Anybody disagree with this?
Click to expand...
Screenshot 2024-01-21 at 21.37.16.png

He moved a little bit of the foam (a crafty thing to do), but the main mark is still there, our players and the referee should have been more switched on.
 
Jah

Jah

Jack Armstrong
In the wall I think only Omabamadele is looking that way when he does it. Even the ref is being distracted by Brentford players. In the heat of the moment, it would have been easy to miss it happen with the concern on making sure you do your defensive job, without having to check that the kick taker is not cheating, because in theory there is a whole team dedicated to that
 
B

Browser79

First Team Squad
www.bbc.co.uk

Forest write to referees' chief over Toney goal

Nottingham Forest ask refereeing chief Howard Webb for clarification around Ivan Toney's goal in Saturday's 3-2 defeat at Brentford.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Wonderfully balanced from the beeb as per. Forest have written to complain, now here’s two chumps who disagree.

Nuno has had 2 point-losing pieces of bullshine in 4 premier league games. He and the club are perfectly entitled to kick off. Make some noise. Not having this turn the other cheek, take your medicine crap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom