Cortez the Killer
Impressive member
It's to illustrate Garth Crooks is talking bollocks again.That's very nearly an extremely unfortunate positioning of the quotation marks there!
Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk
It's to illustrate Garth Crooks is talking bollocks again.That's very nearly an extremely unfortunate positioning of the quotation marks there!
The question is: What is the actual point of Garth Crooks?It's to illustrate Garth Crooks is talking bollocks again.
Sent from my SM-G780G using Tapatalk
Why would ya do that?Just read the John Aldridge column in the Liverpool Echo!
Wash your fukcing mouth out with soap and water. Soap and water, no way does that sound scouse.Shit mate, your version of f***ing sounds f***ing scouse
I thought this Sky analysis was pretty even.I watched the indepth analysis on Sky sports last night provided by Carragher & Theirry Henry.
They both agreed it was a mistake and we should have had the ball - but then talked through the play until the goal - basically saying we had the opportunity to clear but didn't - which is of course true.
The one bit they didn't discuss and I haven't seen elsewhere was the taking of the throw-in half way through the time from Liverpool getting the ball back and the goal.
I saw it happen on Saturday - but didn't really realise the impact until re-watching last night.
Forest cleared the ball out for a throw-in on the halfway line.
The Liverpool player picked it up and looked to throw it down the line (their right wing) - we set up to defend that position. Then all of a sudden a different Liverpool player took the throw-in with a different ball 30 yards further back - and they attacked down their LH wing.
The player who had the original ball was left standing on the halfway line and just causually rolled the ball behind him and then ran back on to the pitch.
How can that happen - that just as much effect as the original decision. The Sky experts didn't even comment on it
Not through choice....just popped up on another feed, so thought I would give it a look and take onboard their balanced and fair opinion!Why would ya do that?
Did you begin with 'The first thing you do is buy a ticket to the game' and they were lost at that point?Just spent half an hour trying to explain the rules of football to some Liverpool fans on Facebook - thick as mince, all of them.
I’d suggest Forest charge the Football Association with failure to provide a competent referee.We’ve just been charged + Steven reid for events after final whistle. You couldn’t make this shit up!
That is of course, „Mental Health champion and coach“, Steven Reid.We’ve just been charged + Steven reid for events after final whistle. You couldn’t make this shit up!
Not really complaining what they did talk about - it is more what they didn’t talk about.I thought this Sky analysis was pretty even.
They call Tierney a bottler and make the point that Hudson Odoi should not have allowed Diaz to get the ball and kick it back to the keeper and how that move from Diaz on some level got all the forest players moving back into defensive positions.
This is a lack of street smarts and getting too emotional. And is arguably the worst of any of the following mistakes…
1) Neco not playing out with composure
2) CHO and Taiwo dawdling
3) Andrew and Neco not spotting that Alexis was going to cross
Callum could have just picked the ball up when the whistle went and waited patiently for the drop ball. Hopefully he will learn from this, and be more confident in future to know that the drop ball would come to him. He needs to borrow some of Morgan’s fight and channel his anger in the right places.
Still doesn’t excuse Tierney not having the balls to take on board what his 4th official told him and pulled the play back but that’s not something any Forest player can control.
It wasn't incompetence.It was never even mentioned by the sky experts - although they were actually showing it on the screen behind them whilst they talking about Nino being frustrated
Dead right he was frustrated - total incompetence
I was referring to the officiatingIt wasn't incompetence.
Our resident expert ref says that they don't bother with throw ins these days (to take them from the correct spot and there is apparently no such thing as a foul throw ), it's just a means of starting play again or some such nonsense.I watched the indepth analysis on Sky sports last night provided by Carragher & Theirry Henry.
They both agreed it was a mistake and we should have had the ball - but then talked through the play until the goal - basically saying we had the opportunity to clear but didn't - which is of course true.
The one bit they didn't discuss and I haven't seen elsewhere was the taking of the throw-in half way through the time from Liverpool getting the ball back and the goal.
I saw it happen on Saturday - but didn't really realise the impact until re-watching last night.
Forest cleared the ball out for a throw-in on the halfway line.
The Liverpool player picked it up and looked to throw it down the line (their right wing) - we set up to defend that position. Then all of a sudden a different Liverpool player took the throw-in with a different ball 30 yards further back - and they attacked down their LH wing.
The player who had the original ball was left standing on the halfway line and just causually rolled the ball behind him and then ran back on to the pitch.
How can that happen - that just as much effect as the original decision. The Sky experts didn't even comment on it
I know. And it wasn't incompetence.I was referring to the officiating
So what was it then?I know. And it wasn't incompetence.