• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

The World Famous City Ground - Home of the PROPER WORLD‘S OLDEST LEAGUE CLUB

Future of the WFCG? What‘s your preference?


  • Total voters
    172

Ashley

Steve Chettle
I don’t know why the whole conversation is revolving around capacity. A new main stand still leaves you with three stands that are extremely dated and need replacing even if they are replaced with stands of similar capacity.

The best option to me is to try and establish ourselves in the premier league and then look at building a new stadium on the current site whilst ground sharing elsewhere
The debate about moving away from the City Ground began because some people don't feel the plans for extending to 38k provides enough capacity.

I'm not sure how possible it would be to build a brand new stadium on the current site TBH.
 

Masuka

Jack Burkitt
The debate about moving away from the City Ground began because some people don't feel the plans for extending to 38k provides enough capacity.

I'm not sure how possible it would be to build a brand new stadium on the current site TBH.
I agree the current site does have constraints and I have no idea how councils work but you would think rushcliffe council would do everything in their power to keep the ground in west bridgford with the money it brings into the local area. If that means booting a few people out of their houses then so be it 😂
 

Morpeth

John Robertson
If you look at a map, it’s more like Newcastle/Sunderland is one big city with two clubs in it TBF. But they aren’t comparable in any case because there’s something different about football culture up there.
There’s no difference up here than anywhere else I’m afraid.

And Newcastle and Sunderland are two totally separate cities - there’s nothing to say other than that. Very similar in distance to Nottingham and Derby, but much more difficult to travel between.
 

Yoghurt Slice

First Team Squad
Think I've agreed with Ashley on almost every point other than this is the prem, and it's likely imo that we could draw more fans than we currently might expect due to the marketing and exposure of the division. But for me, somewhere in the 38-45k capacity is the right target for now. That would involve a new PT stand, extended and joined up Bridgford end, and a new BC stand eventually. We could pull 50k fans for some games I think. But economics. Cost/benefit ratio in a largely unpredictable, results driven business. I think shooting for 50k right now would be financial suicide.

I think we should aim for the new PT stand to be a fair bit bigger than the current BC stand, to absorb mid-season attendance losses due to the loss of the stand while it's being rebuilt. Then go from there as and when. Ideally wrap the Bridgford end both tiers round to join, mirroring the other side as a 2nd stage. BC stand is well out date and built over the old stand, so needs replacing but hold off on that until the money and league status makes it make sense.

I've no chance of getting tickets next season (also I work most Saturdays and often evenings) but it'd be so so nice to be able to get one if I can make it to a match once or twice a year. Just not happening without either a) expansion or b) relegation.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
If we like the current CG why not build a new ground identical to the current CG, but with slightly larger, more modern up-to-date stands. Convenient transport links, great foot outlets and pubs and a superb firework display area.

Then dig a bloody great lake that looks a bit like that section of the Trent.
 

GOBIAS

Ian Bowyer
They,'re exactly what I want Forest to avoid
Don’t get me wrong. I want us to stay where we are. But I could be sold on the new ground if it was impressive and in the right location.

It would have certainly solve a lot of issues with spending a season playing in a 3 sided stadium when the PT is built, and possibly again if other stands are redeveloped.
 

GreeksBearingGifts

Stuart Pearce
Out of curiosity: has there been the slightest hint from the club that there are second thoughts to the plan to stay at the CG?

As for the capacity argument, I think you are missing the wider picture: ticket revenue is gradually becoming less important as the percentage of tv money in the balance sheets grows. And a growing part of the tv money in the future will depend on stadium atmosphere. To put it bluntly, a 38,000 full stadium on fire every single match will eventually make more money for the club than a half-empty most of the time 60,000 stadium. Not to mention the difference in helping the team perform better.
 
Out of curiosity: has there been the slightest hint from the club that there are second thoughts to the plan to stay at the CG?

As for the capacity argument, I think you are missing the wider picture: ticket revenue is gradually becoming less important as the percentage of tv money in the balance sheets grows. And a growing part of the tv money in the future will depend on stadium atmosphere. To put it bluntly, a 38,000 full stadium on fire every single match will eventually make more money for the club than a half-empty most of the time 60,000 stadium. Not to mention the difference in helping the team perform better.
We're miles behind on stadium income. While the TV revenue dwarfs what we'd take, it all helps, especially if we get relegated again. More income, tickets, conferences, restaurants etc etc would have helped with previous FFP breaches.
 

Morpeth

John Robertson
Out of curiosity: has there been the slightest hint from the club that there are second thoughts to the plan to stay at the CG?

As for the capacity argument, I think you are missing the wider picture: ticket revenue is gradually becoming less important as the percentage of tv money in the balance sheets grows. And a growing part of the tv money in the future will depend on stadium atmosphere. To put it bluntly, a 38,000 full stadium on fire every single match will eventually make more money for the club than a half-empty most of the time 60,000 stadium. Not to mention the difference in helping the team perform better.
If it’s that unimportant then make it 80k and give the tickets away for free.
 

Redemption

Agenda Benda
If it’s that unimportant then make it 80k and give the tickets away for free.
Thebworse thing in the world would be a half empty stadium because you can't give the tickets away!
 

Cloughie1975

John Robertson
Daft I know, but I love the aftermath of the goal v Arsenal when Colin Fray says about the ball ending up low in the Trent End net. Stuff like that makes me glad we are hopefully sticking at the City Ground and not building a soulless bowl with imaginative names like the South Stand.
Yes-the ‘Sewer End’ at Stoke Bardolph doesn’t capture the imagination.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
Daft I know, but I love the aftermath of the goal v Arsenal when Colin Fray says about the ball ending up low in the Trent End net. Stuff like that makes me glad we are hopefully sticking at the City Ground and not building a soulless bowl with imaginative names like the South Stand.

The Nicky Eaden Corner.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
I always thought that a new stand or two would be required to improve the commercial offering at the club as well as adding to the fan numbers during games.

The current use of the ground every two weeks for nine months of the year does not make commercial sense. To have large and small conference venues, wedding (even) and party areas which could be used at times when the ground is not active as well as top class in-game hospitality would improve the whole view of the club as well as raising much needed revenue.
 

MaxiRobriguez

Bob McKinlay
I always thought that a new stand or two would be required to improve the commercial offering at the club as well as adding to the fan numbers during games.

The current use of the ground every two weeks for nine months of the year does not make commercial sense. To have large and small conference venues, wedding (even) and party areas which could be used at times when the ground is not active as well as top class in-game hospitality would improve the whole view of the club as well as raising much needed revenue.

Problem is there isn't the demand for conferencing and hospitality in Nottingham like there is in London, Manchester or Birmingham.

I think if we're incorporating non-seating revenue from we have to think outside the box of what that could be. Something that encourages every day folk to traipse down not just business affiliations. Difficult when it's not in the city centre.
 

eyupmeduck

Geoff Thomas
I always thought that a new stand or two would be required to improve the commercial offering at the club as well as adding to the fan numbers during games.

The current use of the ground every two weeks for nine months of the year does not make commercial sense. To have large and small conference venues, wedding (even) and party areas which could be used at times when the ground is not active as well as top class in-game hospitality would improve the whole view of the club as well as raising much needed revenue.
Its a good point, I'm not by any means suggesting that this would be a viable route for Forest but Spurs make over £100m a year from their stadium in ticket sales for matches but bring in loads from stuff like NFL matches, boxing matches and concerts as well.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 

Buster38

Long Throw Specialist.
Very nice. If you go through Felton on the way back get yourself to ‘The Running Fox’. It does afternoon tea which you can take away but the sizes and quality of the pies, sandwiches and scones are amazing and it’ll sort you out all the way home!
It's true that. Go to Widdrington a lot so The Running Fox (and Cook & Barker) are favourites with my lot. Size Matters!
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
Its a good point, I'm not by any means suggesting that this would be a viable route for Forest but Spurs make over £100m a year from their stadium in ticket sales for matches but bring in loads from stuff like NFL matches, boxing matches and concerts as well.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
That's exactly my point. These events both as you suggest and the other commercial prospects have to be fought for just like footballing success. Things don't fall into our laps, you have to go out and prospect, lure people in by having the facilities, both food and space, for their activities, whatever they may be.

To build a super stand with all the extra facilities there then just to stand back and say that's job done seems daft.

It's not easy, but then, nothing is unless you're born with a silver spoon.
 

Timothy Pope

I know that Nuno that I know that Nuno that I know
Far I have travelled
And much have I seen,
Currys, PC World, are places I've been,
Poundland, Toys'R'Us,
Now echo the sound,
Of the boys in the red,
From the Out of Town Ground

🎩
 

redun

Youth Team
I agree the current site does have constraints and I have no idea how councils work but you would think rushcliffe council would do everything in their power to keep the ground in west bridgford with the money it brings into the local area. If that means booting a few people out of their houses then so be it 😂
You have got to be joking.
 
Top Bottom