„Big“ Evangelos be like:"We're really sorry, Jeff got a spider in the cab and dropped a floodlight through the roof..."
„Big“ Evangelos be like:"We're really sorry, Jeff got a spider in the cab and dropped a floodlight through the roof..."
In the old days that advice was dependent on which Shippos pub you drank in. Its cask-conditioned bitter or mild in places like The Falcon at Canning Circus, or The Golden Fleece on Mansfield Road matched any modern-day award-winning cask ale. The dodgy stuff was almost always draught-delivered in pubs where the staff didn't know how to keep it.They better sort the bogs out if it’s Shippo’s.
Aye... let's hope there's better signage than the East Stand.They better sort the bogs out if it’s Shippo’s.
Oh, I agree totally. It needs all agencies to get together and work through the problems. It just seems that no-body cares. If we are serious about offering a premium product, then services have to match.I understand the sentiment, I walk over Lady Bay by exiting at the back of the Bridgeford to avoid those steps.
Im not sure the club could just put extra steps or lighting in though, its not their land for a start. Also the bottleneck outside the Southbank, is that down to the club and how on earth could that ever be reduced?
You pay peanuts you get monkeys. And having seen several Forest job adverts over the years, they certainly pay peanuts.They have arranged for fans to queue in the most awkward way for some reason.
Are they deliberately winding the neighbours up?
There is a lot of backwards thinking behind the scenes
When it rains, you've got a choice of treading water with your phone light in front of you or you can chance the mud steps that our fans have crudely warn into the side of the bank there. Just watch out for stray branches, nearly got caught in the face by one on Saturday haha.Lady Bay Bridge exit is not much better either. Narrow metal steps, again largely in darkness, and often wet is just asking for trouble.
There shouldn't be any question about the local authority's responsibility for improving and maintaining Trent Bridge and Lady Bay Bridge accessways.When it rains, you've got a choice of treading water with your phone light in front of you or you can chance the mud steps that our fans have crudely warn into the side of the bank there. Just watch out for stray branches, nearly got caught in the face by one on Saturday haha.
It's south of the river so in Notts and thus the responsibility of Notts as opposed to Nottm councils, Notts subcontract all the road repairs and stuff out to via which is why most of them are covered in potholes.Think the local authority went bust Otis. Half tempted to go down there with some garden cutters and a spade LOL
Probably the same as the prom from Mabo to Sutton, local council arguing with environmental department who's job it is to shift the sand that's covering it.There shouldn't be any question about the local authority's responsibility for improving and maintaining Trent Bridge and Lady Bay Bridge accessways.
I admire your community spirit Dizz, but given both locations, shouldn't the responsibility be with Rushcliffe BC?Think the local authority went bust Otis. Half tempted to go down there with some garden cutters and a spade LOL
No.I admire your community spirit Dizz, but given both locations, shouldn't the responsibility be with Rushcliffe BC?
I appreciate that confirmation concerning council obligations Red, but I still ask why the City Council should be responsible for issues beyond its boundary, such as the steps on the Rushcliffe side of Lady Bay Bridge. Please excuse my ignorance, but that table clearly points to it being the responsibility of Ben Bradley's mob at County Hall, likewise the accessway under that side of Trent Bridge.No.
In a Unitary authority like Nottingham City Council, they take some responsibilities from the County Council.
But district and borough councils have a much smaller set of responsibilities and the County Council is responsible for a lot of things including transport and highways.
Edit: here''s a table for comparison, Notts County Council is non-metropolitan county, RBC is non-metropolitan district & Nottm City Council is a Unitary authority
View attachment 34190
I was only responding to your question about RBC.I appreciate that confirmation concerning council obligations Red, but I still ask why the City Council should be responsible for issues beyond its boundary, such as the steps on the Rushcliffe side of Lady Bay Bridge. Please excuse my ignorance, but that table clearly points to it being the responsibility of Ben Bradley's mob at County Hall, likewise the accessway under that side of Trent Bridge.
Of course, forgive me; that table provides all of the answers.I was only responding to your question about RBC.
Forest should build up some trebuchets in the car parks behind each stand, to enable supporters leaving the ground to be quickly and easily catapulted across the Trent, avoiding the infamous „pinch points“.
As an added bonus, the bodies will land in the jurisdiction of Nottingham City Council, so they can then pick up the pieces (literally).
I tell you, it’s a doddle, this architect lark.
Could this be something to do with historic boundary and land ownership issues which sees the land on which the CG is built owned by Nottm City Council, even though it's located in WB. Does the City own the Riverside too, hence why the County Council say they won't fix it?I appreciate that confirmation concerning council obligations Red, but I still ask why the City Council should be responsible for issues beyond its boundary, such as the steps on the Rushcliffe side of Lady Bay Bridge. Please excuse my ignorance, but that table clearly points to it being the responsibility of Ben Bradley's mob at County Hall, likewise the accessway under that side of Trent Bridge.
Or even a tunnel under the Trent, opening next to the station! What a pleasant prospect.
I dont want to sound rude, but you are an absolute dreamer!!! Or taking the piss?Or even a tunnel under the Trent, opening next to the station! What a pleasant prospect.
Seriously, the WFCG is always going to be hard to get away from. So .....
facilities to encourage people to stay awhile after the game, to ease congestion
a rejig of the approach to Trent Bridge from Trentside North (no doubt the historical society will object to any alterations to TB itself)
sort out the walkways under TB with paving and lighting (there will be times when these are not useable, as we have experienced recently)
wider steps and lights up to LBBridge
paved pathway and lights under LBB and along to the new pedestrian and cycle bridge
back of the Bridgford ... big tidy up, sort out the trip hazards, remove the dead rats (seriously) and the live ones, better lighting
All of that could be done although it would still be a difficult ground to get away from, but it would be a lot better and safer.
I'm just stating the facts, aside from the tunnel of course.I dont want to sound rude, but you are an absolute dreamer!!! Or taking the piss?
Whichever it is, just have a day off