If ai was a Neville's Lawyer I'd just search this forum and social media for 5 years of fans lauding Marinakis for being a Greek Tony Soprano and burning down bakeries.Should be a fan-led revolt over Neville's gang comments and work to get him ousted.
Greek Tony Soprano is apt. Like Tony EM alienates all the good people around himself albeit without the murder (Cooper, Murphy etc etc) and believes he can do no wrong, also likes an outburst.If ai was a Neville's Lawyer I'd just search this forum and social media for 5 years of fans lauding Marinakis for being a Greek Tony Soprano and burning down bakeries.
View attachment 38935
Does that make hooters the bada bing? And is davies Ralph ciferetto?Greek Tony Soprano is apt. Like Tony EM alienates all the good people around himself albeit without the murder (Cooper, Murphy etc etc) and believes he can do no wrong, also likes an outburst.
So EM to get whacked unceremoniously in a diner sometime soon and we'll be left with the son.
Davies mk1 like Ralphie. A competent lunatic, Davies mk2 probably Richie Aprille, a lunatic trying to take over.Does that make hooters the bada bing? And is davies Ralph ciferetto?
It's a false statistic because it doesn't include any of the incidents that VAR don't referPoor MacInnes in the Guardian joining a long list of snidey journos having a sly dig at Forest. References Forest's particularly combative approach to refereeing.
Backs all this up beause "statistics shared by the Premier League’s chief football officer, Tony Scholes, standards have never been higher. “Before VAR 82% of the decisions made were deemed to be correct...In the season so far, that figure is 96%.””
Obviously no attempt to check if this is true or even explain how they came to such a laughable conclusion.
Also no attempt to understand Forest's situation beyond referencing the Everton game and the panels findings. Not even a mention of Tierney or Jones' cock ups, never mind all those incidents that have affected us all season. Don't worry its ok to get one obvious VAR decision totally wrong unless it happens to be against Liverpool.
History being rewritten in front of our very eyes by a talentless hack.
From what I've read, the data consider all major incidents in a game including those that var check automatically.It's a false statistic because it doesn't include any of the incidents that VAR don't refer
Yes but fans can say what they want amongst themselvesIf ai was a Neville's Lawyer I'd just search this forum and social media for 5 years of fans lauding Marinakis for being a Greek Tony Soprano and burning down bakeries.
View attachment 38935
Don’t worry, I’ve rounded up a few mates, we’re going to keep an eye out for him in JuneSo Howard Webb says they should have had a penalty and the manager and Williams get charged for calling it out at the time. Bollocks to the FA.
Meanwhile Atwell is off to das Vaterland - sanction free.
It's just unfortunate that the 4% of incorrect decisions go against Forest and Wolves 96% of the time.Backs all this up beause "statistics shared by the Premier League’s chief football officer, Tony Scholes, standards have never been higher. “Before VAR 82% of the decisions made were deemed to be correct...In the season so far, that figure is 96%.””
Kampfgruppe Strummer?Don’t worry, I’ve rounded up a few mates, we’re going to keep an eye out for him in June
Why would this change his long term career? He won’t give a f***, his integrity is elevatedWilliams spoke from the heart and it wasn't merely a party line. I hope this doesn't affect his long term career, the lad deserves a break.
I love the guy. I think he’s real and everything about him is from the heart, how he plays and what he says. He may make mistakes but he’s brave enough to own them. He always gives it his all. Good lad.Williams spoke from the heart and it wasn't merely a party line. I hope this doesn't affect his long term career, the lad deserves a break.
If they're using the panel to decide if decisions are right or not the statistic is deeply flawed anyway.It's a false statistic because it doesn't include any of the incidents that VAR don't refer
Absolutely, especially when 40% of the panel is made up of people who would look bad if decisions were wrong..If they're using the panel to decide if decisions are right or not the statistic is deeply flawed anyway.
The example is the foul on Reyna where the panel only looked at whether the foul was sufficient to bring Reyna down and not the actual effect of the foul itself, impeding Reyna from controlling the ball.
And the handball for that matter where it is not mentioned in the panels findings that Young moves his arm towards the ball.
It’s like marking your own coursework. Then moderating your own marking.Absolutely, especially when 40% of the panel is made up of people who would look bad if decisions were wrong..