HappyHappyJoyJoy
Viv Anderson
A wank rather than a shit, I would have thought.
-
All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.
Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL
- Thread starter Alf-engelos Mindminackers
- Start date
Robertson
Viv Anderson
Or putting a bet on
HappyHappyJoyJoy
Viv Anderson
Probably picking up his winnings from his first half Forest not to score bet.
Trents
John Robertson
No audio? Not even between VAR and Assistant VAR? Perhaps they were making a brew.
Red Dog in a Forest
Viv Anderson
The dodgy decisions were occurring before his appointment.
The Fulham game showed how refereeing should be done.
Actually do think, Forest should then ask for the match to be replayed!
Bordering between incompetence & corrupt then!
Nicholas Randall, and the big man be having a busy next couple of months by the looks and sounds of it...
Lefkasman
Ian Bowyer
There were no party,s. If there were I wasn't there. I didn't know it was a party.
Sent from my 23124RA7EO using Tapatalk
Robertson
Viv Anderson
To be honest a replay is one outcome I could live without
.Never going to happen anyway of course.
Captain Sinister
Senior doom Monger
I sat and watched the game on TV ... I've done my time... I don't want to be sentenced to another 90 minutes of that tripe.To be honest a replay is one outcome I could live without
Never going to happen anyway of course.
Source on no audio?
I'm Red Till Dead
Stuart Pearce
It was a simple game. Referees always made the odd mistake, (the crowds didn't question who his father was for no reason) but technology has highlighted these errors and made it more obvious that an error was made and how bad that error was. The multiple camera angles used in highlights shows have proven how bad a referees decision might be. Back in the seventies fewer games were recorded so if a ref made an error you was lucky to see it otherwise it was just a few fans looking in the right directiion at the right time in the right place who would know for sure that there was a problem with the refs call. Many would react to the calls of others when a player went down but would have near absolute convictition that they were right about a foul.
VAR allowing a remote refereeing official was supposed to catch referee errors, but it seems clear and obvious to me that the clear and obvious error proviso in the VAR remit doesn't work. If a referree misses someone kicking the back of a foot hard enough that the kicked foot moves the ball it has to be a foul doesn't it? Moreso surely, than when a player swings and kicks a ball and an opposition moves across from his blindside and is caught by the follow through of the kick.
If the VAR technology doesn't catch the errors the onfield refs make perhaps we should ban the cameras completely and go back to days when the errors were only seen by those in the grounds.
Notcher
Stuart Pearce
How many of us on here said there would be no audio?
Quelle f*ck ing surprise
Quelle f*ck ing surprise
I'm Red Till Dead
Stuart Pearce
Of course we'll get something on Saturday as the game is on Sunday.
Notcher
Stuart Pearce
Where has it been announced LR?
Redemption
Chief Eye Roller
I was in the upper tier of the Bullen Rd stand and I did not see the VAR CHECK message on any of the incidents.
MC Plantpot
First Team Squad
Anyone else remember a frustrated Graham Souness, when Blackburn manager, saying in post match interviews ‘Blackburn Rovers don’t get awarded penalties’ ? I wonder what he was implying because on Monday he was clear there’s no corruption in our game. Was it once corrupt Graham and now gone?
Cloughie1975
John Robertson
Some sports,for example Cricket and Tennis,are better suited to technology because of theIt was a simple game. Referees always made the odd mistake, (the crowds didn't question who his father was for no reason) but technology has highlighted these errors and made it more obvious that an error was made and how bad that error was. The multiple camera angles used in highlights shows have proven how bad a referees decision might be. Back in the seventies fewer games were recorded so if a ref made an error you was lucky to see it otherwise it was just a few fans looking in the right directiion at the right time in the right place who would know for sure that there was a problem with the refs call. Many would react to the calls of others when a player went down but would have near absolute convictition that they were right about a foul.
VAR allowing a remote refereeing official was supposed to catch referee errors, but it seems clear and obvious to me that the clear and obvious error proviso in the VAR remit doesn't work. If a referree misses someone kicking the back of a foot hard enough that the kicked foot moves the ball it has to be a foul doesn't it? Moreso surely, than when a player swings and kicks a ball and an opposition moves across from his blindside and is caught by the follow through of the kick.
If the VAR technology doesn't catch the errors the onfield refs make perhaps we should ban the cameras completely and go back to days when the errors were only seen by those in the grounds.
natural breaks in play.
It’s clear to me that VAR doesn’t really work in football due to the often lengthy stoppages in
what is supposed to be a continually flowing game.
For me,goal line technology is a bonus but I’m afraid VAR needs removing (especially if
it can’t identify obvious errors as was the case in Sunday).
I’m sure 90% of fans would like to see it gone.
Absolutely. You could argue that as long as everyone knows the rules, much of people using wealth and power to access preferential treatment and services is just capitalism without a formally published price list, and is simply cultural. I literally cannot get an NHS GP appointment ATM and I have a serious chronic medical condition, but I can pay £60 to go private and get one straight away.
(Some would strongly disagree with the comparison, but having links to the eastern med and middle east has made me more pragmatic).
Where it is used to obsfucate serious criminality, or by those in control of the law to misuse public funds, pervert the mechanisms of democracy etc, it absolutely has to be stamped out. It's this higher level that I agree is the UK's Great Hypocrisy, and it's sad how little interest both the media and the electorate seems to have in that these days.
Anyway that's probably a convo for different thread.
f*** the Howard Webb and the EPL.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
Alan Akbah
Geoff Thomas
"I didn't even know it was my birthday"
Baronvon
Jack Burkitt
Has anyone got a source for the 'no audio for the 3rd incident' claim?
It wouldn't surprise me - but I'd like to see some proof.
It wouldn't surprise me - but I'd like to see some proof.
Talksport
Source for "no audio" please?
Marco Pascolo
Youth Team
From the Daily Mail
Otis Redding
Try A Little Tenderness
White, Jordan and Murphy were unaware of that until it was raised by a caller, "Forest fan, John", that the Sky commentator (who can evidently hear the officials' conversation in real time) said that Taylor's decision had been cleared by the VAR. At which point, Murphy remarked that if that is the case it's possibly a cause for some concern.
Marco Pascolo
Youth Team
From Skysports Comms and clip on tv even says that what has been said