Rubics
Bin VAR!
Experian, centre parks? Not much else around Notts.
-
All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.
It’s ADIDAS (again!) and KAIYUN SPORTS not MACRON, not BOXT, or UNHCR
- Thread starter DEANFOREST
- Start date
Frank Clark’s Tash
Jack Burkitt
It'd do wonders for their global recognition
Last edited:
Senior Flange Technician
Andy!
Boots? Well what's left of it.
Haych
John Robertson
I’ve just seen this, it’s a list of last seasons shirt sponsorships.
Realistically we can probably demand 3-5M, if we still want 10+ we will be without a sponsor for another year.
Realistically we can probably demand 3-5M, if we still want 10+ we will be without a sponsor for another year.
Quntib Hollox
Jack Armstrong
The authorities would tell us you’re aiding illegal/criminal gangs. The more cynical amongst us would say you’re depriving the state of their slice of VAT.
Either way it would be interesting to hear what you make of the shirts when you get them.
Omar Devone Little
Mr Realistic
Even accepting what those clubs at the bottom got would've been enough to cover Lingard's weekly wage.
Poor business decision. Hopefully we won't make the same mistake this season.
Poor business decision. Hopefully we won't make the same mistake this season.
Redemption
One less gobshite...
Which is why in think we have gone with the matchday/training split with the hope of getting a total sponsorship package of ~£10m
We'd have to have a great season to be in a position to make £10m next year
So another year without would make £3.3m per season I've the first three seasons.
adam09
Super Koopa
Can't lose what you don't have!The respect of your peers, you despicable counterfeiting rascal.
I looked on twitter and many fans of many clubs have bought from there with success.
Quntib Hollox
Jack Armstrong
Experian is probably the only other option anyone has come up with.
Bob Fossil
Nottingham's dirty secret
Why £3-5m?
You'd be looking at teams like Palace, Southampton and Wolves surely.
£6-£8m.
I was told, the club wanted upwards of £10m last season.
And of course, as we know, didn’t get it.
And of course, as we know, didn’t get it.
TrentEndDr
2 Weeks Away
What about Speedo? Their HQ is in Notts. Could get some more leisure wear
Forest-branded budgie-smugglers, what’s not to like?
Redemption
One less gobshite...
You need several seasons in the EPL to validate the global 'eyeballs' that get you the better sponsors.
Everton get a larger sponsor because they have millions of 'fans' in the far East built up over decades.
Currently, Forest are globally unrecognised... whatever you think about it, its a fact.
REDDERS78
Jack Armstrong
I love how people are randomly plucking company names out of the air as if it will be a lightbulb moment for the club 
"Oh yeah, we never thought of them, gerron the phone to em"
"Oh yeah, we never thought of them, gerron the phone to em"
This is Forest.I love how people are randomly plucking company names out of the air as if it will be a lightbulb moment for the club
"Oh yeah, we never thought of them, gerron the phone to em"
They most likely didn’t think of them.
Quntib Hollox
Jack Armstrong
I’m not wearing anything that looks like ***** all over my front!
Timothy Pope
I know that Nuno that I know that Nuno that I know
As an ex employee of Speedo & their parent company - I would say that this is highly unlikely. They will want to focus on the competitive and fitness swimming fraternity.
The same parent company (Pentland Brands - Finchley HQ) also own Mitre (Nottingham HQ) Canterbury, Berghaus (Sunderland HQ) and Endura (Scotland HQ), and of those only Mitre would make demographic sense to sponsor a football team - but that would probably be a problem as Mitre also make football kits and have football supply contracts (or did when I worked there) with the FA Cup and the EFL amongst others.
Morpeth
John Robertson
3 year deal at £2m a year = £6m
1 year with nothing plus 2 year deal at £3.5m a year = £7m
It’s not as simple as just saying we should have had a deal for the sake of having a deal. I believe that the decision last year was made for sound reasons even though it looks a bit weird from the outside.
1 year with nothing plus 2 year deal at £3.5m a year = £7m
It’s not as simple as just saying we should have had a deal for the sake of having a deal. I believe that the decision last year was made for sound reasons even though it looks a bit weird from the outside.
Last edited:
I said this in a post yesterday,doesn't matter if theyve lost out as long as the next deal although shorter is worth more which is what I think will happen.
Barry
Where's me hammer?
Can imagine the two captains modeling their swimwear at the launch, Joe in a pair of trunks and yatesey in a pair of board shorts for obvious reasons.
Sent from my SM-A217F using Tapatalk
Bob D'Imsen
Japanese Tourist
Erm . . . excuse me?
Don't even think about it.
Omar Devone Little
Mr Realistic
Hopefully you're right but that's a pretty big gamble to have taken. If we'd gone down we'd have probably got 1/4 of what we'd get in the Premier League and we'd have basically turned down free money in the millions.
Rzar
Bob McKinlay
I am proud of the club personally, fully support the clubs decision to hard ball the sponsorship as the Forest shirt should be valued and it will pay off in the long term. Accept any old rabble and the next year, you'll get any old rabble at bargain basement price, and the next year... the year after...
And judging from those figures, the club is right when they say that Premier League clubs are selling themselves short in terms of shirt sponsors. If the whole bottom half took our approach the shirt sponsors going rate would double. We just sold a squad player with 1 year left on his deal more than we probably got offered in a shirt sponsor in the first year.
I can't believe there is so much controversy around it personally, although people were literally whinging non stop the other day about a shirt being released (that they've already seen), so why it suprises me I have no idea.
And judging from those figures, the club is right when they say that Premier League clubs are selling themselves short in terms of shirt sponsors. If the whole bottom half took our approach the shirt sponsors going rate would double. We just sold a squad player with 1 year left on his deal more than we probably got offered in a shirt sponsor in the first year.
I can't believe there is so much controversy around it personally, although people were literally whinging non stop the other day about a shirt being released (that they've already seen), so why it suprises me I have no idea.