DanR
Steve Chettle
Also known as One and a Quarter Pride Parks.Had to take my shoes and socks off but by my calculations, if we get this one and the Cornet deal done our spending is exactly £100m. Next level budgeting.
Also known as One and a Quarter Pride Parks.Had to take my shoes and socks off but by my calculations, if we get this one and the Cornet deal done our spending is exactly £100m. Next level budgeting.
Would that take us up to 12 additions since we went up which equates to just over £8.3 million per addition?Had to take my shoes and socks off but by my calculations, if we get this one and the Cornet deal done our spending is exactly £100m. Next level budgeting.
It would be 13 if you include Aguilera. But to be fair we lost 9 (10 if you include Lolley) from our first team squad from last season so whilst 13 sounds loads, our squad still isn't that big.Would that take us up to 12 additions since we went up which equates to just over £8.3 million per addition?
Sent from my SM-A217F using Tapatalk
It's not a farmers league that's saved for Scottish football, but even there you find the odd turd to polish aka Scott mckenna.
I'm just not sure about the defending in the league, I've said it before I'm convinced Germany create 4 world class defenders at different points per generation and in stereotypical Gemany efficiency decides that's enough to win the world Cup and go with it the rest just make up the numbers.
As for this guy there's no doubting you've seen him play more than all of us put together so if you say he'll fit, that'll do for me.
Sent from my SM-A217F using Tapatalk
His rep was "injury prone" as well weren't it?He wasn't even particularly highly rated in Scotland either. Even a pal from Aberdeen said he fights hard but he's championship level at best and will be caught out by pace and skill.
Two or three of the five substitutions invariably involve forward players, who are expected to work their socks off until they ran out of breath. If a midfield works well, it's a bit dangerous to change the players, especially since midfielders are expected to work their socks off anyway.With 5 substations allowed, you would expect 2 of those to be midfielders - so plenty of game time for all
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't see how this rules out Garner? If we get Garner as well that's O'Brien/Garner & Yates/Mangala for our two starting spots in midfieldI'm a bit disappointed with this one, as it proved me wrong that you'd be waiting for Garner until the last minute.
Unless of course you wish to buy Garner at the last minute and send him to us, I wouldn't complain about that.
Fair enough - didn’t realise we’d increased our squad requirement to 3 players for each position.cover
But it's not 5 extra, we also lost Grabban 2nd choice striker, Horvath 2nd keeper, Figs 4th choice CB, Panzo 5th choice CB. All those needed replacing aswell as you can't go into a season with no backups.In fairness we lost 5 loanees and samba so we needed 6 replacements anyway so really it’s only 5 extra. Which if we kept all the others is about right maybe a few more. People not looking at our context of why we have to get so many That’s my biggest gripe with the media because it’s easy research.
Four first class options for two spots? I like it, but Yates will probably not.I don't see how this rules out Garner? If we get Garner as well that's O'Brien/Garner & Yates/Mangala for our two starting spots in midfield
Totally forgot and yes totally agree!! What do people expect us to do? Some people in the media said getting so many could upset the boys who them promoted but we have got any of those feckers left!!But it's not 5 extra, we also lost Grabban 2nd choice striker, Horvath 2nd keeper, Figs 4th choice CB, Panzo 5th choice CB. All those needed replacing aswell as you can't go into a season with no backups.
If we only replaced the loans we'd have a worse squad than last year!Totally forgot and yes totally agree!! What do people expect us to do? Some people in the media said getting so many could upset the boys who them promoted but we have got any of those feckers left!!
Thats some CEO Level shit, right there!Had to take my shoes and socks off but by my calculations, if we get this one and the Cornet deal done our spending is exactly £100m. Next level budgeting.
His rep was "injury prone" as well weren't it?
Sent from my SM-A217F using Tapatalk
You can see what he likes to do in this videoLooks like a dribble machine (99%), but scared of passing forward (progressive passes 5%???!) Defensive contribution weak as both sites rate him
P/S: all those % percentile are: Player compared to positional peers in Men's Big 5 Leagues and European Competition over the last 365 days.
.
Time will tell mate.Looks like a dribble machine (99%), but scared of passing forward (progressive passes 5%???!) Defensive contribution weak as both sites rate him
P/S: all those % percentile are: Player compared to positional peers in Men's Big 5 Leagues and European Competition over the last 365 days.
.
In the video he looked a very progressive player so how do they count progressive passes? Not doubting but he looks like he wants to go forward a lot looking at him dribble.Looks like a dribble machine (99%), but scared of passing forward (progressive passes 5%???!) Defensive contribution weak as both sites rate him
P/S: all those % percentile are: Player compared to positional peers in Men's Big 5 Leagues and European Competition over the last 365 days.
.
Just typing the same thing! He loves a dribble and watching the video of him he dribbled forward a lot so if you dribble forward and lay it off that wouldn’t count as progressive of you know what I mean?Time will tell mate.
Also depends where we intend to play him. I don't think our midfield will be rigid.
Since this recruitment team has come in they have identified players that excell in one or two areas and it has worked really well - instead of a jack of all trades type player. Looks like another one that excells in certain areas.
Equally would like to know what defines a "progressive pass" - as he's pretty high on "Shot-Creating Action", surely that's the same thing.
Just typing the same thing! He loves a dribble and watching the video of him he dribbled forward a lot so if you dribble forward and lay it off that wouldn’t count as progressive of you know what I mean?