• All - as you will understand, the forum is exceptionally busy at this time. The admins and moderators simply don't have time to read every post in every thread. Could you PLEASE use the "Report" option below a post to flag any content that you feel we need to be aware of. We'll review everything reported as a priority and deal with it accordingly. Thank you.

Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL

RedRobbo

Grenville Morris
I’m old enough to remember Nottingham in the top league ( equiv of current Premiership ) when they played at Ireland Avenue.
They supplied a number of internationals - but were always, effectively, a nursery club for Leicester.

Unfortunately my team in recent years was Worcester Warriors ( even had a season ticket ) went the way of several clubs - no longer an entity.
 

Lady Penelope

First Team Squad
Rugby Union has struggled at club level since the advent of professionalism (I mean officially of course). I prefer XIIIs as a game in how it is organised and certainly it is a better watch. No doubt the RU games like Scotland v France are a great occasion, but in England it's the posh boys from the posh schools at the lower levels and I don't like the politics or the spectacle (check: usually there isn't one).

After WW2 the XIIIs game was officially banned in France because it was played mainly in the south where the communist resistance was strongest ('Allo 'Allo). That's not the case anymore and the XIIIs game is well supported and thriving at a local level.

I was talking to a guy at work the other week. He was from St helens. he went to a grammar school there and played RU, yet the school was five minutes walk from the St Helens XIIIs ground. Class warfare in action.
 

Red Ray's Redlist

Viv Anderson
He was trying to clear the ball. Reyna took a poor touch and knew it. Felt the contact which was obviously there, planted his other foot and as an afterthought tried to threw himself to the ground. I always look at incidents and think would I be peeved if that was against us. My answer on that is a deffo yes.
You need to watch it again.
At first look it appears to be a poor touch, but just happens that as he is in the act of controlling the ball someones foot kicks through the back of his. It's irrelevant whether there was sufficient force to bring him down because the important thing was Young kicked Reyna and in doing so impeded his ability to controlthe ball in the area. And throughout this nobody has denied it wasn't a foul just that there was insufficient force to bring him down which is effectively the bit after the foul play.
 

valspoodle

Steve Chettle
Just watching the first half of the Chelsea/Spurs game and, in the middle of the pitch, every touch from behind, hard or a gentle caress, results in a very obvious collapse of stout party and a free kick. Around the penalty area, apparently you need a JCB to shift someone before it's a foul.
 

Alf-engelos Mindminackers

The Artiste formally known as "Wanksy"
However, Clattenburg’s presence has courted controversy amid a series of key decisions that have gone against the team. There is a worry that his involvement and Forest’s decision to seek such guidance from an ex referee has angered the PGMOL and, as a result, has had a negative impact.


Well shock horror, how could anyone have possibly seen that coming :ROFLMAO:
 

tomw94

Geoff Thomas
However, Clattenburg’s presence has courted controversy amid a series of key decisions that have gone against the team. There is a worry that his involvement and Forest’s decision to seek such guidance from an ex referee has angered the PGMOL and, as a result, has had a negative impact.


Well shock horror, how could anyone have possibly seen that coming :ROFLMAO:
Feel sorry for him really, I think he has been bullied out of it by Neville & Co. Must have been tough mentally for him to receive such abuse for simply taking an honest job.
 

Col Steve Austin

Viv Anderson
Feel sorry for him really, I think he has been bullied out of it by Neville & Co. Must have been tough mentally for him to receive such abuse for simply taking an honest job.
Kind of proves that the PGMOL are a bunch of corrupt bastards really.

The decisions definitely got worse once Clattenburg was hired.
Exactly the above. As we all now know, Neville etc. are just mouthpieces for PGMOL following their cosy chats, so it was clear PGMOL weren't happy and wanted to teach us a lesson.
 

eyupmeduck

Geoff Thomas
Feel sorry for him really, I think he has been bullied out of it by Neville & Co. Must have been tough mentally for him to receive such abuse for simply taking an honest job.
Absolutely, for me what sours it more is that little know it all Mancunian cock will believe he is right.

Hes not, he's still a cock and PGMOL are now proven to be inept rather than it just being in our opinion.

I think he's taken one for the team in truth, we may well be getting fined for our X post but to separate this from our psr points rebate he's taken the bullet so we look like a compliant EPL member....for now.

Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
 

HappyHappyJoyJoy

Viv Anderson
Everyone admitting the PGMOL definitely do hold grudges then and that that is completely fine apparently.
This, if Clattenburg's presence had any effect at all, either way, then the PGMOL can't be properly impartial.

I don't think we've helped ourselves at times but the lack of scrutiny of this whole sorry affair by the media is telling.
 

coops89

First Team Squad
I don’t like the fact that pundits like Gary Neville can make an individuals job untenable. I know he has the Gladiators gig but he might have needed the income we were providing. Wonder how Neville would feel if influential people in the media called for him to lose his job…
 

REDDERS78

Jack Armstrong
He was trying to clear the ball. Reyna took a poor touch and knew it. Felt the contact which was obviously there, planted his other foot and as an afterthought tried to threw himself to the ground. I always look at incidents and think would I be peeved if that was against us. My answer on that is a deffo yes.
Throwing yourself to the ground has no impact on the action though does it? Decisions aren't, or shouldn't be based on reaction but the action itself, and he was kicked.

The only question is did he kick him because he planted his foot and if the answer is yes then cancel 50% of fouls dished out this season. If that happens anywhere else, or for a a top 6 club then its given, every day and twice on a Sunday.

You see, I'm old school, never a penalty, never a handball BUT they have set themselves a precedent now, they have set the benchmark themselves. The fact that non were given totally contradict the precedent that they have set and what we have seen this season, you cant just keep changing those protocols weekly or to suit a scenario.

They are wankers, end of story.
 
Top Bottom