GregorRobertson
Jack Burkitt
Although most of our current players aren’t going to the World Cup so I’m not sure it’s going to be that market we’re shopping in exclusively.
Exactly. In blackjack parlance we have a 17 hand.Forest really seem to need to move away from managerial churn.
There will like as not be quite a lot of player churn.
We don’t want stagnation as that leads to a club going nowhere but downwards.
There is a change mode in world systems called “Dynamic Equilibrium”.
I think that’s what we need at Forest.
Lol. Us older brainsCap, I'm not being rude mate, but what the f***ing hell are you banging on about![]()
True, but we are not dining from the top table. So we are the mercy of others and will have to wait our turn.But most of the players they want will be at the World Cup, so little will happen until afterwards.
iraola is being linked with clubs like Leverkusen so we probably don’t have much of a chance anyway.As Maxi suggested the only name I would have been tempted to twist for was Iraola. If that's not viable then Vitor all day long for me. I do think Iraola is great, however who knows how he would fit into Forest, the way we're ran isn't for everyone!
I'm sure that we're more appealing & can compete financially with teams from second rate European leagues that nobody gives a toss aboutiraola is being linked with clubs like Leverkusen so we probably don’t have much of a chance anyway.
That applies equally whether we stick with Pereira or replace him this summer.Yeh I don't think it really changes much other than our short term commitment, which is better than nothing. At least we know who will be starting the season in charge and we have all summer to plan around it. The reality is though, all it takes is a poor run of form and we all know the big man won't hesitate to make changes
Won't most teams be in the same situation? The World Cup gets in the way every four years, just as the Euros does.
Exactly thisDifference between Vitor & other managers we have had is we play with a real intent & authority under VP. It doesn't seem to matter who we play, we approach the game like we are the better team. He doesn't seem to play with any caution, he is just a pure risk taker. Can't wait to see what he can do for us next season, priority should be keeping as many players as possible, not signing new ones.
Our performance to me means we can’t say barring a handball we go 9 unbeaten. We were very poor today. Yes I agree it gives us a better chance if it was given but on balance I reckon we still lose.Exactly this
What VP has shown quite clearly is that we have the players for a top half finish and bar a clear-as-day handball not being given today we'd have gone nine unbeaten in the league
We 100% need a striker, mind
And a left (wing) backWe 100% need a striker, mind
VP has got the most out Taiwo, Jesus and MGW. That’s a credit to him. Without Anderson next season it will be interesting to see how we get on. I think we need far more pace at centre half. I don’t think Morato and Milenkovic are good enough in our style. Harvey Barnes’s goal last week show that. We need more pace at centre half.Difference between Vitor & other managers we have had is we play with a real intent & authority under VP. It doesn't seem to matter who we play, we approach the game like we are the better team. He doesn't seem to play with any caution, he is just a pure risk taker. Can't wait to see what he can do for us next season, priority should be keeping as many players as possible, not signing new ones.
Blimey Emmo, I know you're hard to please but 'very poor', really? We were too open certainly and didn't cover ourselves in glory defensively but we looked a constant threat going forward. If MGW's goal was an equaliser I think there was only one winner from that point on, sadly, they'd been handed (pun intended) a total joke of a goal. I thought we were excellent in an attacking sense but needed to be better defensively. If that's 'very poor' though, I don't know what kind of bar is needed to give them some praise.Our performance to me means we can’t say barring a handball we go 9 unbeaten. We were very poor today. Yes I agree it gives us a better chance if it was given but on balance I reckon we still lose.
If we play like that away from home against top 10 sides we’ll lose everytime. Thats all. United away is hard so I’m not angry but that dosen’t mean we played well. We were lucky not to lose by more.Blimey Emmo, I know you're hard to please but 'very poor', really? We were too open certainly and didn't cover ourselves in glory defensively but we looked a constant threat going forward. If MGW's goal was an equaliser I think there was only one winner from that point on, sadly, they'd been handed (pun intended) a total joke of a goal. I thought we were excellent in an attacking sense but needed to be better defensively. If that's 'very poor' though, I don't know what kind of bar is needed to give them some praise.
But we haven’t, hence the unbeaten run, so not sure why that has become a baseline?If we play like that away from home against top 10 sides we’ll lose everytime. Thats all. United away is hard so I’m not angry but that dosen’t mean we played well. We were lucky not to lose by more.
I agree and before I haven’t said we played poorly but today was an off day and we played poorly. I agree with your point. All I was saying was today was a poor performance.But we haven’t, hence the unbeaten run, so not sure why that has become a baseline?
It’s similar to saying if we play every away game like Sunderland then we could challenge for the league
It was a nothing game that we went out in to attack FFS, same with Man UnitedIf we play like that away from home against top 10 sides we’ll lose everytime. Thats all. United away is hard so I’m not angry but that dosen’t mean we played well. We were lucky not to lose by more.