Standard of Referees

Berkshire Red

John Robertson
I have to say that this is a genuinely shocking stat. I do not understand how any side can go a full season without at least a few PKs being conceded. Especially with so many one goal victories.
Shock! Horror! The team with the most decisions going their way wins the League. Almost as though the PGMOL or whoever sponsors them could decide who wins the League, isn't it?
 

HappyHappyJoyJoy

Stuart Pearce
Shock! Horror! The team with the most decisions going their way wins the League. Almost as though the PGMOL or whoever sponsors them could decide who wins the League, isn't it?
Its almost like football is a low scoring game and individual refereeing decisions have outsized impact.

But that cant be true because if it was then referees would welcome an open and honest discussion about any biases they might have, in order to reduce that impact as much as possible.

And we certainly cant have anything like going on, it would hurt their feelings.
 

Redofheaven2

First Team Squad
A bit later recognising this after the medals have been handed out… if only there was some kind of system where the game could be reviewed instantly and info passed to the ref so he could correct errors or things he had missed during the game…
 

PynchonForest

Stuart Pearce
For Canada's friendly today vs the Uzbekkis, we have decided to use, ta da!, a Canadian refereeing crew.

Only in Canada you say?
 

Statto

Free Kick Specialist
For Canada's friendly today vs the Uzbekkis, we have decided to use, ta da!, a Canadian refereeing crew.

Only in Canada you say?
Should have asked Borat
 

Trents

Stuart Pearce
This beginning of the end for Referee's Assistants?


Only a matter of time before offsides become fully automated

Soon all they will be good for is a better view of who wins a throw in on their quarter of the lines.
 

PynchonForest

Stuart Pearce
And they'll still look at the ref half the time to see which way they think they should flag.
Not for that reason. Cross flagging (ie AR signals one way and ref signals the other) doesn't help with match control. EXperienced refs and ARs understand when one or the other has a better angle, and should defer to the other when it makes sense. As a general rule, each AR has a quadrant, and the ref has two. Standard practice is to let the AR deal with their respective quadrants, and the ref to deal with the other two (for goal kick/corner kick and direction of a throw in).
 

Colin Addison

First Team Squad
Not for that reason. Cross flagging (ie AR signals one way and ref signals the other) doesn't help with match control. EXperienced refs and ARs understand when one or the other has a better angle, and should defer to the other when it makes sense. As a general rule, each AR has a quadrant, and the ref has two. Standard practice is to let the AR deal with their respective quadrants, and the ref to deal with the other two (for goal kick/corner kick and direction of a throw in).
That sounds far too sensible to be true.
 

valspoodle

Ian Bowyer
In some well-publicised cases the quadrant system obviously doesn't work. We've had a few in the Prem, so in that case, if the ref and lino can't see it properly (and we've had a few which the lino has had to adjudicate a corner or goal kick from the other side of the pitch and got it spectacularly wrong) why not use VAR? Surely VAR can't bugger that up and we would not then be conceding a goal from a guess by an unsighted lino or ref?
 

PynchonForest

Stuart Pearce
In some well-publicised cases the quadrant system obviously doesn't work. We've had a few in the Prem, so in that case, if the ref and lino can't see it properly (and we've had a few which the lino has had to adjudicate a corner or goal kick from the other side of the pitch and got it spectacularly wrong) why not use VAR? Surely VAR can't bugger that up and we would not then be conceding a goal from a guess by an unsighted lino or ref?
So if something doesn't work every single time then it is no good? This seems to be your logic "the quadrant system obviously doesn't work".
 

valspoodle

Ian Bowyer
So if something doesn't work every single time then it is no good? This seems to be your logic "the quadrant system obviously doesn't work".
From what I've seen, no , it cannot be relied upon. I remember at Norwich, where the fans look directly along one goal line with the lino on the other side. The ball was inaccurately passed back to our keeper who dived on it with his back to the lino with the ref miles away. It was clear to us that the ball had not crossed the goal line, but despite the ball being over half the pitch away with the two posts and the keeper's body in the way, the lino waved for a corner!

You will note that I said the system cannot be guaranteed to work, not that it was no good. You weaken your argument by purposely misunderstanding the points made. Much as the PGMO seem to do on occasions when there are contentious decisions made.

I merely said that if there is doubt by both officials, then why not use VAR?
 

Steve B

John Robertson
Just heard the England fans singing this song in 1966 World Cup Final. Made me laugh.

Oh oh what a referee
He went and lost his pea
And his little wooden whistle wouldn’t whistle


The standard of referee songs would get a little bit more venomous a few years later.
 

FLC

Viv Anderson
IMG_0261.png
 

TrickiestTree

World's only Lars Veldwijk replica shirt owner
Surely Forest are +6? That in itself also tells a story of biased corruption
Thats the amount wrong vs right. We might have had 3 decisions go our way in losses, then 4 go against us in losses/draws that would have given us 6pts, but still only had one more go against us than for us
 
Top Bottom