Tricky Tourist
Geoff Thomas
Thank you for this post. I have even more misgivings about this appointment than you appear to, in part because of what you've outlined, partly due to Glasner's supposed alienating of players - in stark contrast to VP's cohesive, vibes approach - and partly due to his defensive, counterattacking style that had Spurs fans expressing concern about when he was being touted for their managerial role. I hope this works out, obviously, but I would have much preferred we gave VP a full pre-season and let him loose on the Prem with a stronger squad. I still maintain, I cannot remember another Forest coach who was as tactically astute and able to make decisive in-game changes as VP. I fear we've gone and done another McLeish here.I must say that I am not quite as over the moon as others here. Before anyone jumps down my throat and calls me negative or unrealistic, I will say this appointment is probably around the most "ambitious" we could have realistically attained for where we are now, and Glasner is clearly a talented coach, so I am not against the appointment per se.
But a lot of what the Palace fan here has said strikes a chord with what I thought about Glasner from the outside. Didn't really pull up any trees in the league with Palace, but was able to deliver runs of form where they looked fantastic (often against the big teams too). This is enough to make him a bit of a darling among the media, who are always looking for the next hot new thing to build up and then tear down.
But despite the media love-in, they often looked quite a poor/mediocre team for me, and for quite sustained periods too.
The obvious thing that OG can point to, and EM has clearly latched on to, is the trophies. As the Palace fan has intimated, if Henderson gets sent off in the FA Cup Final, and Parish reads his emails, then Palace probably exit the Europa League at the QF or SF stage and Glasner leaves without any trophies. In short, he looks like a streaky/cup manager to me.
What I would say in his defence, and probably what EM is thinking, is he actually won those cups, and did so at previous clubs too. And at the end of the day, that's a fact. Nobody in football has much time for the "fine margins" when you lose, so why should we be too bothered about them when you win? As the great Peter Taylor once said - I paraphrase - "the replay also shows we've got the cup, that's the main thing."
Here's hoping he is actually a bona fide winner, and we can stop this managerial churn. Or failing that, very lucky. Same outcome.