• Forum has been updated to an interim version. Please advise of any anomalies via the "Care in the Community" thread. Thank you. (You can 'x' this message when you've read it)
  • WIN A FOREST SHIRT!

    Registered members of LTLF can enter a free competition to win a shiny new Nottingham Forest shirt. Choose from home or away, and you can even get a name/number on it into the bargain! There's a question to answer, and the winner will be selected from the right answers. For details and to enter, look at the thread by clicking WIN A FOREST SHIRT!!

    Dismiss this notice by clicking the x in the top right corner

Nicolò Savona

Honestly, football forums are the last bastion of reality on the internet because people can be held accountable for their posts. Pretty much 90% of everything else on the internet is fake or clickbait now.
I was saying in another thread recently that I think social media is the worst thing to happen to society, but its also the worst thing to happen to the internet too.

The internet used to be an interesting and fun place in the 00's before social media became mainstream, and forums used to be the main places where people used to go to discuss things, have a laugh, find information or discover new stuff. Nowadays the internet is just full of clickbait or ragebait, and in cases like this article just frankly absolute bullshit.

I am really thankful this place still exists, because if places like Twitter or Facebook were the only places to discuss Forest or football online I wouldn't bother at all.
 
Not sure why they felt the need to go in 2 footed on him, of course he's a downgrade on Aina (the pre injury version at least) but he's done a decent enough job for someone that's having to learn and adapt to this level while being thrown in the thick of it

If they were looking to offer reasonable criticism they could highlight his lack of pace, but I suppose that's too boring and lacks the sensationalism modern journalists insist on
 
My definition of fine is that he is no longer targeted by the likes of Fulham and Everton and doesn't need dropping forcing our best player to swap flanks because the manager is worried Everton will roast Savona again.
Righto. So a bit unrealistic then.
He’s doing fine relative any reasonable expectations though. Especially with regards to his transfer fee.
 
Not sure why they felt the need to go in 2 footed on him, of course he's a downgrade on Aina (the pre injury version at least) but he's done a decent enough job for someone that's having to learn and adapt to this level while being thrown in the thick of it

If they were looking to offer reasonable criticism they could highlight his lack of pace, but I suppose that's too boring and lacks the sensationalism modern journalists insist on
He is a bit slow to be fair, yes. Doesn’t always have to prove fatal.
 
My definition of fine is that he is no longer targeted by the likes of Fulham and Everton and doesn't need dropping forcing our best player to swap flanks because the manager is worried Everton will roast Savona again.
And it’s not “the likes of Everton” is it. It was specifically Jack Grealish we assume Dyche was worried about.
 
I generally like The Athletic, but this is a terrible take. Paul Taylor should find out if the writer has even watched us once this season. (Can’t get the photo to upload)

93. Nicolo Savona, Juventus to Forest​

October rating: 82

The Athletic’s reported transfer fee:£12million

Contract length: Five years

What we said then: Lofty (6ft 2in/192cm) Juventus academy graduate who broke into the first team there last year, starting 29 games in all competitions and earning an Italy call-up.

What we’re saying now: You wondered why Juventus were happy to let a young-ish player leave for such a small fee… and it’s since become pretty apparent. When you’ve been labelled as “Carl Jenkinson reincarnated” on social media, it’s safe to say it’s not going well.
I binned-off The Athletic precisely because they kept posting shite like this, and dressing it up as insightful journalism.

It is absolute prefabricated, made up bollocks, by a "journalist" who has probably barely seen the lad play, bar on a couple of occasions on television.

I would sooner believe what I read in Pravda.
 
I binned-off The Athletic precisely because they kept posting shite like this, and dressing it up as insightful journalism.

It is absolute prefabricated, made up bollocks, by a "journalist" who has probably barely seen the lad play, bar on a couple of occasions on television.

I would sooner believe what I read in Pravda.
I think them recently publishing an article demonising Forest fans for "poverty chanting" at matches that actual people in poverty can't afford to attend whilst ensuring that people in actual poverty can't access the article by putting it behind a paywall sums them up. Click bait bollocks for the social media age.

As Alf says, you get more insight and information by just going to football forums and finding out stuff from people who actually watch and/or go to the games.
 
Last edited:
Can understand Dyche being concerned about Savona vs Grealish. I don't really understand how he came to the conclusion that Zinchenko would fare any better. A baffling decision, as was the tactical decision to play in a way that played into Everton's hands.
Dunno really. Not fully convinced it was all Zinchenko’s fault we lost to be honest, or that any other defender we might have picked would have made any difference whatsoever.

It was more the utter inability to create anything in the final third. That said I hope we can get someone a lot better than Zinchenko in pronto.
 
Dunno really. Not fully convinced it was all Zinchenko’s fault we lost to be honest, or that any other defender we might have picked would have made any difference

It was more the utter inability to create anything in the final third. That said I hope we can get someone a lot better in pronto.
True it wasn't his fault, but I thought he was pretty shit and Savona might've offered a bit more than he did.

As you say, the main reason we lost is we created nothing (probably because we were wedded to the idea of slinging meat and drink crosses onto the Everton centre halves heads for 90 minutes!).
 
True it wasn't his fault, but I thought he was pretty shit and Savona might've offered a bit more than he did.

As you say, the main reason we lost is we created nothing (probably because we were wedded to the idea of slinging meat and drink crosses onto the Everton centre halves heads for 90 minutes!).
And Zinchenko didn’t help much there either to be fair.
 
Even if you don't rate him, its ridiculous to single out Savona as one of our worst signings. He's not even the worst fullback we signed this summer; he's been miles better than Zinchenko.
They rate Zinc at 139 tbf. I'm just having a look through the list now. Cuiba what his name and Gunn are 153 and 148 respectively for never playing for us.

Edit: McAtee 123, Cunha 120, Kali 117, (Elanga 110 lol), Bakwa 95, John 87, Luiz 86, (Isak 70), Ndoye 58, Hutch 39, Jesus 25.
Seems it's generally shit for everyone and people in the comments from all sorts of clubs are ripping into it. However rage bait will drive more comments and more clicks than good journalism. Gotta keep the money flowing.... God I hate the modern internet.
 
Last edited:
Savona is a centre back covering at full back. I think he's doing a pretty good job!
I agree with you, he is, but his playing record indicates that he's primarily a right-back who can move inside to CB - that's not to say he didn't originally start there however.
 
I generally like The Athletic, but this is a terrible take. Paul Taylor should find out if the writer has even watched us once this season. (Can’t get the photo to upload)

93. Nicolo Savona, Juventus to Forest​

October rating: 82

The Athletic’s reported transfer fee:£12million

Contract length: Five years

What we said then: Lofty (6ft 2in/192cm) Juventus academy graduate who broke into the first team there last year, starting 29 games in all competitions and earning an Italy call-up.

What we’re saying now: You wondered why Juventus were happy to let a young-ish player leave for such a small fee… and it’s since become pretty apparent. When you’ve been labelled as “Carl Jenkinson reincarnated” on social media, it’s safe to say it’s not going well.

That’s just nonsense. He’s been solid and scored a couple of important goals. He's better at football than the Athletic are at journalism, in this case.
 
I generally like The Athletic, but this is a terrible take. Paul Taylor should find out if the writer has even watched us once this season. (Can’t get the photo to upload)

93. Nicolo Savona, Juventus to Forest​

October rating: 82

The Athletic’s reported transfer fee:£12million

Contract length: Five years

What we said then: Lofty (6ft 2in/192cm) Juventus academy graduate who broke into the first team there last year, starting 29 games in all competitions and earning an Italy call-up.

What we’re saying now: You wondered why Juventus were happy to let a young-ish player leave for such a small fee… and it’s since become pretty apparent. When you’ve been labelled as “Carl Jenkinson reincarnated” on social media, it’s safe to say it’s not going well.
What absolute bollocks
 
Savona is a centre back covering at full back. I think he's doing a pretty good job!
I think this lad would be good alongside side M&M in a back 3
 
While we're slagging off individual players what about this fella? Really shocking last night. So slow the fullback went past him as if he wasn't there. Allowed his man a free header first half so doesn't look capable of playing CB either. Another crap signing. Play Abbott next time if you need FB cover. He's never let us down like Savona did last night.
 
Yep Savona was useless last night as well. It looked like it was his first ever game in the way he was constantly off the pace. What I couldn't understand is that Dyche had Abbott preparing to come on for ages, presumably at RB but chose not to do it.

Aina was also shocking but I was really surprised when Williams came on for him and not Savona.
 
Top Bottom