Red Dog in a Dinghy
Geoff Thomas
Not long to go now!!!
No!Mods - Can we have an apostrophe before the 26 in the subject please?
On a serious note it wouldn't surprise me. I suppose it depends on what happens between now and then as Jair and Savona could turn out to be brilliant or complete duds. There's an element of gambling with both of them.I wonder if we need more defenders?
why only 10 ? bring in 24 more so we can 4 squads ready plus more.I've seen absolutely nothing from Victor, Cuiabano, Jair, Savona, Luiz and Bakwa so far, and very little from McAtee, Hutchinson, Kalimuendo and Jesus.
So we'll need at least 10 in in January.
Yeah. I'd be quite surprised if we didn't go for a fullback in Jan.A new CB or LB?
Outgoings: Boly and Awoniyi (I’m sure someone is going to need a striker).
Possible Outgoings: Morato.
Unlikely: MGW or Sangare.
I can’t see much else besides that.
Cuiabano could come into the squad as a left back, once a place becomes free.A new CB or LB?
Outgoings: Boly and Awoniyi (I’m sure someone is going to need a striker).
Possible Outgoings: Morato.
Unlikely: MGW or Sangare.
I can’t see much else besides that.
If everyone got 28 man squads it makes sense. Just European clubs is ridiculous.I read an article the other day that certain cartel 6 clubs (Scouses, Mancs & Cockneys) are pushing to extend the squad size to 28+ players, because of the amount of games they have to play across 4 competitions and their players playing around 8-10 international games per season - in a non World cup/Euro's year.
Although that would potentially benefit us this year - I think it would be a bad idea as the Cartel 6 would then just buy up the best players from the other clubs, including ourselves to make their numbers up. I also don't know how they would make the finances work for PSR regulations
Thoughts?
I was against the 5 subs rule as I thought it would benefit the top 6 clubs. However, I think the new rule helps with getting more game time for under 21 players and also improves the game. Can see the logic of more players, as the amount of games the top 7/8/9 clubs have to play has got bigger with various European games and internationals.I read an article the other day that certain cartel 6 clubs (Scouses, Mancs & Cockneys) are pushing to extend the squad size to 28+ players, because of the amount of games they have to play across 4 competitions and their players playing around 8-10 international games per season - in a non World cup/Euro's year.
Although that would potentially benefit us this year - I think it would be a bad idea as the Cartel 6 would then just buy up the best players from the other clubs, including ourselves to make their numbers up. I also don't know how they would make the finances work for PSR regulations
Thoughts?
But why should the entire Premier League have to be changed to suit the top however many clubs? The odds have been stacked in favour of a fortunate, rich, entitled few clubs time and time again over the years and I don’t see why they should be given any more advantages over everyone else. They’re only playing so many European games as the tournaments were changed to give them more games and more money and to reduce the chances of the so-called elite teams getting knocked out early on.I was against the 5 subs rule as I thought it would benefit the top 6 clubs. However, I think the new rule helps with getting more game time for under 21 players and also improves the game. Can see the logic of more players, as the amount of games the top 7/8/9 clubs have to play has got bigger with various European games and internationals.
My problem is they they change the financial rules to benefit even more clubs like Man City who we are still waiting to see how they fudge any punishment for the 115 charges.
Exactly-I remember when Liverpool crashed out in the 1st Round of a 2 legged European Cup game in 1979 (of course Forest beat them at the same stage the previous season).But why should the entire Premier League have to be changed to suit the top however many clubs? The odds have been stacked in favour of a fortunate, rich, entitled few clubs time and time again over the years and I don’t see why they should be given any more advantages over everyone else. They’re only playing so many European games as the tournaments were changed to give them more games and more money and to reduce the chances of the so-called elite teams getting knocked out early on.
Unfortunately I also remember our crashing out at that stage in 1980 but yes, you usually got the result you deserved and if a ‘bigger’ team lost over two legs then so be it.Exactly-I remember when Liverpool crashed out in the 1st Round of a 2 legged European Cup game in 1979 (of course Forest beat them at the same stage the previous season).
It couldn’t happen now.
As it should be.Unfortunately I also remember our crashing out at that stage in 1980 but yes, you usually got the result you deserved and if a ‘bigger’ team lost over two legs then so be it.