• Forum has been updated to an interim version. Please advise of any anomalies via the "Care in the Community" thread. Thank you. (You can 'x' this message when you've read it)
  • WIN A FOREST SHIRT!

    Registered members of LTLF can enter a free competition to win a shiny new Nottingham Forest shirt. Choose from home or away, and you can even get a name/number on it into the bargain! There's a question to answer, and the winner will be selected from the right answers. For details and to enter, look at the thread by clicking WIN A FOREST SHIRT!!

    Dismiss this notice by clicking the x in the top right corner

Danilo

If he'd stayed, he'd have played probably about as much as Yates has, if i'm honest. He would have liked played more last season but obviously getting injured for half of it and the emergence of Elliot Anderson put paid to that.

He's gone to Botafogo and become a better player because he's played more. If I didn't know who he was and you said he was available in the summer for like 20-25m, I'd be pretty happy with that. With Elliot going, I'd imagine that having different profiles of midfielders would be advantageous for us.

Honestly, if Botafogo hadn't blocked Textor doing it, he probably would have come back in January.

That said though, it was a good move for everyone to move him on in the summer. Central Midfield is not a position we've been short in.
 
If he'd stayed, he'd have played probably about as much as Yates has, if i'm honest. He would have liked played more last season but obviously getting injured for half of it and the emergence of Elliot Anderson put paid to that.

He's gone to Botafogo and become a better player because he's played more. If I didn't know who he was and you said he was available in the summer for like 20-25m, I'd be pretty happy with that. With Elliot going, I'd imagine that having different profiles of midfielders would be advantageous for us.

Honestly, if Botafogo hadn't blocked Textor doing it, he probably would have come back in January.

That said though, it was a good move for everyone to move him on in the summer. Central Midfield is not a position we've been short in.
Had a poor last half-season following his return from a bad injury but by accounts went on to have a really good pre season with us just before he was sold. I'm certainly not opposed to his return here, unlikely now as it is.
 
Cant play for Botafogo anymore as if he makes one more appearance for them he wont be able to transfer to another Brazilian club, And Botafogo are in massive financial trouble
 
Cant play for Botafogo anymore as if he makes one more appearance for them he wont be able to transfer to another Brazilian club, And Botafogo are in massive financial trouble

Go gerrim, Mazza! :ph34r:
 
Doesn't meet the cupid stunt requirement though

Cupid Stunt.gif
 
I'd love to know what gear their scout is on if the report on Danilo being a Casemiro replacement is what he sees in him, couldn't get two more opposite players
No idea. Maybe something has changed in his game over the last year. Could be that when it says replacement it doesn't mean literally in terms of style, who knows?

I do seem to vaguely remember something quite a while back when Danilo was doing well with us about United having some interest in him.
 
Never been part of the "Bring him back" crowd but this is one player i'd certainly have back.
Definitely
Should never have let him go in the first place
I agree with you, but there's a fair amount of hindsight in that call.

He had a bad injury and then looked a shadow of the player he was before it.

Playing in Brazil is no way equivalent to playing in the PL. Scarpa ripped up that league and did little here, although his crypto scam issues probably didn't help there.

I think the club had to decide whether or not to take a significant offer and risk the player getting his form back, over not taking the offer and him not and having to take a massive hit on his resale, of course, there are two other combinations in between that.

You can see why it happened
 
Should never have let him go in the first place
20/20 hindsight is working.
Maybe we should have let him go back to Brazil on a season-long loan deal.
But that would expose us to the risk pointed out by another poster: that of him never recovering his pre-injury form, (which was a bit erratic to be fir, even before the broken ankle), and us not recouping any of the fee we paid for him when we bought his services.
 
Harry Hodge suggested on the wireless that Fulham are taking him.
To be fair, I saw nothing in his Botafogo highlight reels that suggested he’s evolved beyond what he was when fit for us. I suspect he’s just got more exposure for the national team playing in Brazil. I’d take him back but I don’t think he’d move the needle where it needs to be moved (assuming Ando leaves).
 
Top Bottom