Wayde van Kneejerk
Youth Team
Subside Sports have them ready to go with Wood on the back...number front and back. Should that help. Had never heard of the site, but it arrived within a week.
They are a decent and long established company, I have bought from them myself before.Subside Sports have them ready to go with Wood on the back...number front and back. Should that help. Had never heard of the site, but it arrived within a week.

Ask Andorra how ruthless England are."We've got a lot of work to do in a short space of time" - Woody an hour or two ago in Fort Lauderdale after NZ's worst loss in 9 years.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/36097...ss-nine-years-first-fifa-world-cup-warm-match
The All Whites have one more game before their opening World Cup clash against Iran.
On Saturday night UK time, in Tampa. Against.....errr....England....![]()
should beAnd now to watch my man at the World Cup. Come on you All Whites!!!
Wonder if he will still be with us (U Reds) next season? One-year deal?
I actually visited Haiti three years ago during the height of a murderous armed insurrection in the shantytowns of Port-au-Prince.Losing to Haiti, a country ran by armed gangs, a self proclaimed leader who calls himself General BBQ and a population so poor they have to revert to eating mud cookies....can't be good for confidence. I was hoping NZ could have a decent World Cup.Prince
Very much helped by the top three sides in their confederation qualifying automatically as hosts. They have been in the finals before back in the 70s and, weirdly, became one of the teams you could buy in Subbuteo. I remember buying it because I liked the kit!Haiti qualifying for the World Cup is even more baffling than seeing North Korea playing in South Africa 2010.
It's just the result of FIFA's money grabbing expansion. 16 more teams than four years ago just means 16 less quality sides making up the numbers. They still haven't ruled out going to 64 teams in 2030 too.Haiti qualifying for the World Cup is even more baffling than seeing North Korea playing in South Africa 2010.
To be honest, I'd prefer 64 teams to 48.It's just the result of FIFA's money grabbing expansion. 16 more teams than four years ago just means 16 less quality sides making up the numbers. They still haven't ruled out going to 64 teams in 2030 too.
Yep this World Cup has used 16 venues. A 64 team world cup would need at least 20, maybe a few more. We're probably the only country that could supply such a comp with decent overall capacity. Even then no doubt it would be more of a UK bid.The bad thing about the expansions is not really the extra games or teams in my opinion, it's that it rules out certain countries ever hosting the World Cup & we will see these stupid joint host tournaments.
We will just see the World Cup passed between the same countries. Really, it is a farce we haven't hosted one since 1966. We wouldn't even need any new stadiums for it. There is about 6-7 World Cup standard stadiums in the capital alone.
London alone would host an absolutely banging World Cup. A million times better than it taking place across thousands and thousands of miles and three countries that hate each other like this one.The bad thing about the expansions is not really the extra games or teams in my opinion, it's that it rules out certain countries ever hosting the World Cup & we will see these stupid joint host tournaments.
We will just see the World Cup passed between the same countries. Really, it is a farce we haven't hosted one since 1966. We wouldn't even need any new stadiums for it. There is about 6-7 World Cup standard stadiums in the capital alone.
Yep, and it would probably in terms of square miles be a similar sized tournament to Qatar.London alone would host an absolutely banging World Cup. A million times better than it taking place across thousands and thousands of miles and three countries that hate each other like this one.
I like this idea, but with one change, that there would be only 1 ground in London, which is Millwall.I guess this London World Cup is just a bit of a thought experiment but I reckon an everywhere in the UK (and Ireland) but London World Cup would be just as doable and a lot more fun.
(f*** London off basically)
f*** me you’d need the Samaritans on urgent standby for supporters after forcing them into such grotty shitholes.I like this idea, but with one change, that there would be only 1 ground in London, which is Millwall.
That got me thinking whether we could host a world cup only in really shit places or crap grounds. My nominations for host clubs/cities (England only) would be as follows:
Millwall
Crystal Palace
Hull
Middlesbrough
Carlisle
Bolton
Burnley
Leeds
Huddersfield
Stoke
Coventry
Derby
Wolves
Milton Keynes
Reading
Portsmouth
Good luck getting Shakira to play the half time show up at Brunton Park!I like this idea, but with one change, that there would be only 1 ground in London, which is Millwall.
That got me thinking whether we could host a world cup only in really shit places or crap grounds. My nominations for host clubs/cities (England only) would be as follows:
Millwall
Crystal Palace
Hull
Middlesbrough
Carlisle
Bolton
Burnley
Leeds
Huddersfield
Stoke
Coventry
Derby
Wolves
Milton Keynes
Reading
Portsmouth
FIFA are actually trialling this idea in 2034...That got me thinking whether we could host a world cup only in really shit places